🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:28:07 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
<Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:46:54 -0400, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com>
>wrote:
>
>>You still haven't answered how any of this Iraq or Social Security crap 
>>has anything to do with making last week's Supreme Court decision over 
>>property rights Bush's fault.
>>
>>It's like you're just itching to rant about Social Security and Iraq and 
>>we're not obliging you when we stick to the topic of the Supreme Court's 
>>decision so you just keep bringing it up over and over and over again in 
>>the hopes of dragging someone into the argument you want to have.
>>
>>Either that or just a spectacular idiot.
>>
>>Which is it?
>
>The SCOTUS decision on eminent domain is a non-sequitur.  Unless it
>can be over ruled on appeal, it is a done deal.  There is nothing that
>can be done about it, unless it can be over ruled on appeal.

Sure there is something that can be done about it. And with luck, it
will be. A new court can rule in the reverse, or even reverse itself. 
Its done regularly.  Need I remind you of Dred Scott?

And we have two justices who are ready to check out...which will
greatly change the dynamics, depending on who gets appointed...and how
much uproar the public makes.
>
>I don't know how to go about an appeal of this infamous decision, but
>someone with your high intelligence certainly would.  Is that on topic
>enough for you.  Happy?
>
>I'm leaving this thread for more important things.
>
>Lg

Gunner


"Considering the events of recent years, 
 the world has a long way to go to regain
 its credibility and reputation with the US."
                                 unknown