🚀 go-pugleaf

John, I only said that we have a culture and a language that are 
different from those characteristic of Arabs.  I said nothing of state 
supported terrorism.  Iran is, unfortunately, a state that supports 
terrorism.  This much is true.  Iranians are not, however, arabs for the 
aforementioned reasons.

You ought not to equate Arab with terrorist.  Tim McVeigh, after all, 
was NOT Arab, but he WAS a terrorist.  Is it possible that Iranians 
living in the US are terrorists?  Yes, it is.  However, they are not 
Arab terrorists, but Iranian terrorists.  Or Persian terrorists.  Do you 
understand what I say?


John Gilmer wrote:

> "xganon" <nobody@xganon.com> wrote in message
> news:46394480ceed6aee5bfbe878a75e7983@xganon.com...
> 
>>##
>>Cutmarks: --
>>
>>There were objections to a recent article on Slate that counted Iran as an
>>
> Arab nation.  The basis of these objections is for Iranians to wash their
> hands of the recent attack on the United States.
> 
>>Iran is still an anti-American state and has been for twenty years; the
>>
> American flag is burned and trounced on there almost daily. So at this
> juncture, what difference does it make whether we call it an Arab nation or
> not? They are an enemy either way.
> 
> Well, the Iranians are not Arabs, the Paks are not Arabs, the Afghans are
> not Arabs.
> 
> But the Afghans (or at least the rulers) permitted Arabs to enter their
> country and set up camps to train folks to attack the US and US interests.
> 
> The best thing the Afghans can do to reduce the loss of Afghan life would be
> to rise up and KILL every Arab they come accross.   Were this to happen, the
> US would have little interest in Afghanistan.   Because we are nice guys we
> would continue to send food to Afghanistan but our military would be out of
> there.
> 
> Iran is definitely a self-declared enemy of the US.   Likewise, Iraq (which
> is definitely an Arab country) is a self-declared enemy of the US.
> Fortunately for US interests, these two countries also hate each other.   In
> the Iran Iraq war in the 80s, Iranians died in the 10's of thousands using
> human wave tactics against a fairly modern Army.
> 
> As "W" said, this "war" may last YEARS.   I don't know when the Afghan stage
> will be over but until it is, "W" will follow A. Lincoln's advice to only
> fight "one war at a time."   When the Arabs in Afghanistant are dead I
> suspect that "W" will go after the Arabs in Africa outside of Eqypt.   The
> US will not require any cooperation from other Muslim countries to do this
> as the "bad countries" have coasts!
> 
> 
>>There are half a million Iranian nationals living on U.S. soil, many
>>
> illegally, most ungratefully, some of whom are terrorists waiting for
> orders, and none of whom belong here, in my opinion.
> 
>>As we go about the process of eradicating our enemies, let's not quit
>>
> before we're done with Iran. Whether one considers them Arabs or not is not
> really an issue.
> 
>>What happened on September 11 should not be labled "tragic events" or any
>>
> other euphemism. It was, unquestionably, an attack, and the Iranians were
> snickering and passing out cake just as the Palestinians, et. al.
> 
>>
>>War protesters, consider this:
>>http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/horowitzsnotepad/2001/hn09-27-01.htm
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>>--== Sent via Deja.com ==--
>>http://www.deja.com/
>>
>>
> 
>