Re: LA area ISPs

Article View: la.general

Article #2837

#2837

From: Rick Ellis
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 00:00

12 lines
1267 bytes

In article <329E443B.60381F9@pacbell.net>,
Grand Inquisitor D.A. Hacker (fnord) <dhacker@pacbell.net> wrote:

>I'm using PacBell these days -- $20 flat per month, have never had
>connection or bandwidth issues, and they charge directly to my phone
>bill -- one less accounting issue to deal with...

PacBell is a major source of spam on the net and so far has failed to
even respond to complaints let alone do something about it.  Many sites
are considering filtering out all Usenet posts from PacBell.  You may
want to find another provider before you find yourself isolated.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <57qh57$q26@philippi.alphalink.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3297ebc9.35521638@news.oz.net> <329DB3E6.1C20@primenet.com> <329E443B.60381F9@pacbell.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,8dff990f7ffbeaba,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1028a6,8dff990f7ffbeaba,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1028a6,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,5f3370f52c89fe11
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
From: ellis@ftel.net (Rick Ellis)
Subject: Re: LA area ISPs
Date: 1996/11/30
Message-ID: <57qh57$q26@philippi.alphalink.com>
X-Deja-AN: 201623899
references: <3297ebc9.35521638@news.oz.net> <329DB3E6.1C20@primenet.com> <329E443B.60381F9@pacbell.net>
organization: Franklin interNet, Westlake Village, CA  [http://www.ftel.net]
newsgroups: la.general,oc.general,ca.general

Reply to Parent Message