🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: la.general
Article #2981

Re: Ventura Blvd. Subway vs. Burbank Branch

#2981
From: Mark Jolles
Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 00:00
53 lines
3379 bytes
tlw@Eng.Sun.COM (Tom Wetzel) wrote:
>
>
>---
>Michael Higby writes:
>[..]
>>And yes, it should run the entire length of the line from Burbank Metrolink to 
>>Chatsworth Metrolink.  
>
>The most recent plan doesn't follow this idea; it swings off at Canoga Ave.
>to serve Warner Center and Woodland Hills. This is probably a better generator
>of traffic than running up the SP r-o-w to Chatsworth, given the concentration
>of offices in Warner Center.
>
>>And it should be planned by planners who worked back 
>>east and know how to do it the right way.  East Coast planners think 
>>about neighborhood features, attractions, etc. when planning stops, as opposed 
>>to LA planners who only think about what local politicians want (see 
>>yesterday's LA Times). 
>
>The problem is not the particular people employed by planning agencies.
>Planners everywhere lack the ultimate say. The particular configuration
>of political forces in a given area will determine this. Real estate
>developers have been the dominant economic and political force in Southern
>California since the late 19th century. Unless you have strong popular
>organization, and a developed sense of community (historically weak in
>Southern California due to the high proportion of people in a given
>area who are new there at any given time), the ongoing and well-heeled
>organization of the major businesses and property interests will tend
>to get what they want.
>
>Tom Wetzel
>:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>thomas.wetzel@eng.sun.com
>
>


They may get what they want in the short term but they got a lot of 
congestion and a big mess in L.A. long term and that doesn't help the 
value of anybody's development.

I think the locals need higher standards and a better understanding of 
what investments will work and which don't.  They've been sold freeways 
in Southern California for the last 20 years on the premise that they 
will relieve congestion.  I don't think that it worked too well.

On the east coast I think it is the citizens who try to assure that 
things are planned properly.  L.A. is so transient that I guess nobody 
cares.  It appears that they haven't cared themselves into gridlock with 
no viable options and a damn ugly city.  The planners seem pretty spacey 
down there also.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4m8o3m$arm@romeo.logica.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <MHigby.2730.0431F13B@Primenet.com> <4m87n7$3bh@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1123cb,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gid1123cb,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public
X-Google-Thread: 10ca13,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ca13,public
X-Google-Thread: f59f9,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,38a2961ff1b78c88
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
From: Mark Jolles <Jollesm>
Subject: Re: Ventura Blvd. Subway vs. Burbank Branch
Date: 1996/05/01
Message-ID: <4m8o3m$arm@romeo.logica.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 152473068
references: <MHigby.2730.0431F13B@Primenet.com> <4m87n7$3bh@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM>
to: tlw@Eng.Sun.COM
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Logica Inc.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: la.general,misc.transport.urban-transit,la.news,la.transportation,alt.california,ca.general
x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)