Article View: la.general
Article #3067Re: Proposed SF Valley Cities WAS Re: Who Should Be Mayor Of LA?
From: Michael Higby
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 1996 00:00
36 lines
2566 bytes
2566 bytes
av494@lafn.org (David Trebilcock) writes: >In a previous article, MHigby@Primenet.com (Michael Higby) says: >All very nice, but one problem. You ignore the critical importance many >people attach to the name of the area where they live. I know that you >want to keep "North Hollywood," but what about the people who were so >desperate to get out of North Hollywood that "Valley Village" was created. 1) Most people in Valley Village still consider the neighborhood North Hollywood, as opposed to the silly West Hills-Canoga Park wars. Its a distinct neighborhood within the North Hollywood district such as NoHo, Valley Plaza, etc. 2) The names would be the names of the city, such as Los Angeles is the name of the current city. Even with the City of Van Nuys, for example, you could have numerous districts and neighborhoods such as Sherman Oaks, Sherman Village, College Park, etc. 3) By having distinct neighborhoods within a district or community (as is done back east) you can foster more ownership of a given neighborhood within a city. >If you want some additional names for your dream cities, try: >Owensmouth (a holdover from the water wars period of the State). I had thought of Owensmouth, but it doesn't sound sexy. We did keep Runnymede, especially appropriate with the current popularity of Jane Austen novels, Merchant-Ivory movies. ----- Michael - MHigby@primenet.com Join The BooZoo Comics Mailing List World Wide Web: http://www.bolis.com/L/listinfo/boozoo or E-mail me to subscribe -----
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MHigby.2397.03BCEB14@Primenet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<MHigby.2383.05766C37@Primenet.com> <MHigby.2364.277E009D@Primenet.com> <4ero8r$hc9@garuda.csulb.edu> <31122adc.188057 <1996Feb4.013026.15160@lafn.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,bbd8fd9eda670c0b X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 1123cb,bbd8fd9eda670c0b X-Google-Attributes: gid1123cb,public X-Google-Thread: 108112,f6ecbef8934d16a1,start X-Google-Attributes: gid108112,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,bbd8fd9eda670c0b X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,bbd8fd9eda670c0b X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public From: MHigby@Primenet.com (Michael Higby) Subject: Re: Proposed SF Valley Cities WAS Re: Who Should Be Mayor Of LA? Date: 1996/02/04 Message-ID: <MHigby.2397.03BCEB14@Primenet.com> X-Deja-AN: 138007875 sender: root@primenet.com references: <MHigby.2383.05766C37@Primenet.com> <MHigby.2364.277E009D@Primenet.com> <4ero8r$hc9@garuda.csulb.edu> <31122adc.188057 <1996Feb4.013026.15160@lafn.org> organization: Primenet x-posted-by: ip110.lax.primenet.com newsgroups: la.general,la.news,ca.general,alt.california,alt.planning.urban