🚀 go-pugleaf

" krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message 
news:PssFg.99$Te.18@trnddc07...
>
> "pitchforks and torches" <ShrubImprisoned@theHague.com> wrote in message 
> news:p_jFg.503$yO7.227@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>
>>>> We are NOT seeing reports of US troops falling dead from exposure to 
>>>> chemweapons used as IEDs.
>>>> Thus, there are no QUITE LETHAL chemical weapons left to weaponise and 
>>>> use.
>
>>> They would be lethal if fired. They are inert until then.
>
>> I wonder how insurgents would get their hams on a GHN-45 (155mm 
>> howitzer), and why no-one would notice them dragging it through the 
>> streets (most of Iraqs gun tractors had been withdrawn in an attempt to 
>> re-supply the front line troops during the Iraq/Iran war, and then they 
>> were unable to withdraw under fire. Immobile and unsupported the majority 
>> of the guns were destroyed at their positions either by air strikes or 
>> counter-battery fire.).
>
>    The issue is NOT "insurgents" getting them.

No. The issue was the existance of WMDs found after the illegal invasion
Nobody killed by WMDs = No WMDs.

>The "insurgents" (read IRANIANS and Syrians etc) were not running Iraq in 
>2003.

No, "insurgents", in this context = Iraqis fighting the illegal invasion of 
their sovereign nation by
American troops.
>
>> And then there's the little issue of a propellant change ( bag type or 
>> MACS ).
>> You don't find this stuff lyin' around, unless you fail to secure the 
>> ammo dumps and rush to protect the Oil Ministry.
>
>> You're now WAY out in left field ( bleachers, nosebleed section ) in your 
>> attempt to bolster a specious argument.
>> Why don't you stick to cheerleading the cheerleader ( Mike ) who is busy 
>> cheering for the Cheerleader-in-Chief.
>
>    Actually Saddam's army had those things in 2003. TRY to pull your head 
> out of your ass and deal with WHEN the statements about WMD were made in
2003

How about pulling your head out of your ass, then climb outa Mikes ass, and 
then try to understand that
we are discussing WMDs that never existed, except in the ShrubCo attempt to 
cow you into a quivering state of fearful, unthinking, "patriotic" 
acquiescence to the PNAC plan to pimp out the oily countries to his Oil 
bidness partners. M'Kay?