Article View: la.general
Article #3535Contempt
From: Anonymous
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 00:00
113 lines
5995 bytes
5995 bytes
This man is scum. He is going to order your sons and daughters to their deaths in an undeclared, illegal war that cannot be won AGAINST A SOVERIGN COUNTRY THAT ATTACKED NO AMERICAN OR NATO COUNTRY. Write your rep's and tell them NO GROUND TROOPS! Contempt Ruling Could Have Big Cost for Clinton Updated 4.12 p.m. ET (2012 GMT) April 14, 1999 By Steve Holland WASHINGTON � President Clinton's contempt of court ruling raised the possibility Tuesday that he could be charged hundreds of thousands of dollars more in legal fees and be disbarred from practicing law in his home state. J. Scott Applewhite/APClinton has always insisted that his answers in the Jones deposition were 'legally accurate' even though admittedly they were misleading U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Little Rock, Arkansas, found Clinton in contempt Monday for giving "false, misleading and evasive answers" in his Jan. 17, 1998, sworn testimony in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit against him. White House officials were leaving it up to Clinton's lawyer Robert Bennett to comment on the ruling. Bennett has declined comment beyond saying that he is reviewing the ruling. Clinton has 30 days to request a hearing or file a motion to appeal. There has been no official announcement of his decision, but the Washington Post reported in Wednesday editions that the president did not plan to challenge the order. It quoted sources familiar with the advice Clinton has received from attorneys and advisers, but said the president had not yet been presented with a final recommendation. Lanny Davis, former White House special counsel, said he was recommending Clinton not appeal the order. "This is a non-story that the books are closed on and the country has moved on and so should he," Davis said. He said Wright could have made her point without citing Clinton for contempt, calling it "extremely irregular" that she did so. Wright ruled that Clinton must pay any reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by his "willful failure" to tell the truth in the Jones testimony. Mike Wintroath/APClinton has already paid Jones and her lawyers $850,000 to settle her lawsuit She also referred the matter to the Arkansas Supreme Court's Committee on Professional Conduct for review, meaning Clinton could be barred from practicing law in Arkansas after he leaves office. Clinton's denial under oath in the Jones case that he had a sexual relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky triggered a year-long ordeal in which he was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives and finally acquitted by the Senate in February of perjury and obstruction of justice charges. Clinton has always insisted that his answers in the Jones deposition were "legally accurate" even though admittedly they were misleading. Asked if Clinton still felt he told the truth, White House spokesman Joe Lockhart said: "I don't believe the president has changed his view." John Whitehead, who was one of Jones' attorneys, said he did not yet know the total legal fees and expenses that he and a team of six or seven other lawyers incurred during the deposition process and the events that occurred afterward. "We'll have our billable hours. So you're looking at mucho, mucho, mucho hours. You're looking into the hundreds of thousands in legal fees," Whitehead said. Plus, he said, the lawyers' legal expenses would total tens of thousands of dollars. "We're going to hit him for what's fair," he said. Wright herself has ordered Clinton to pay the $1,202 it cost for her to travel to Washington from Little Rock in January 1998 for the Jones deposition. What constitutes reasonable attorneys' fees was likely to be a dominant topic in Bennett's deliberations over whether to appeal the ruling. Stephen Saltzburg, law professor at George Washington University in Washington, said Clinton should let the contempt order stand and not appeal. He doubted whether the court would approve huge legal fees and expenses against Clinton. "I think it would be a bad mistake to appeal it because it just invites the court to say something more bad about it," Saltzburg said. "I think he would be better off letting this go." Clinton has already paid Jones and her lawyers $850,000 to settle her lawsuit. He has run up about $9 million in legal bills defending himself against various legal entanglements over the past six years. About $3 million of that has been paid, leaving him with outstanding legal debt of at least $6 million. Clinton, in a CBS interview on March 31, said he did not regard the historic impeachment vote against him in the House as a "badge of shame." Now he faces the ignominy of being the first president ever cited for contempt. Saltzburg said it could have been worse, that Wright could have charged Clinton with criminal contempt, which carries possible criminal penalties. "Her opinion is not that harsh an opinion in most respects. It could have been a lot worse," he said.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199904171324.PAA18205@mail.replay.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fd4d4,50b8a4e8f4da50b4,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd4d4,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,50b8a4e8f4da50b4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,50b8a4e8f4da50b4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> Subject: Contempt Date: 1999/04/17 Message-ID: <199904171324.PAA18205@mail.replay.com> X-Deja-AN: 467621525 Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <abuse@replay.com>. Newsgroups: la.general,ct.general,dc.general