🚀 go-pugleaf

Tracey*Levin wrote:
> 
> Nightwriter wrote:
> >
> > Ok everyone here is the bottom line:
> > Abortion: Government has NO Right to tell anyone what medical preceedure
> > they can or can not have. And No One has the right to pass judgement for
> > the bible states that GOD claims that privledge soley as his alone.
> > Religion: this "institution" has caused more death, destruction,
> > discrimination and hatred over the last 2,000  years than any other human
> > invention. Salvation and inner peace is best found through spirituality
> > not static ritualistic religions that reinforce segrigation and
> > seperation.
> 
> Well, then if we cannot have a say about medical procedures, then we
> cannot be crtical of the germans who used  medical procedures to removal
> facial skin from the faces of Jews which they turned into lamp shades
> and other things.

Hardly a medical procedure. It was a taxidermic procedure. Performed after the
jews were brutally murdered by an insane regime.

> And, we cannot be critical of the government that uses lethal medical
> procedures to put to death those it feels are in the way. Im not talking
> about capital punishment, Im talking about moving people out of the way.

You're alleging that the government promotes abortions to eliminate the
underclass? Care to substantiate that?

> 
> What youre suggesting is classically liberal.  Liberals do not want
> anyone telling them that there are moral absolutes and limitations to
> their behavoir.

Care to tell us exactly who, other than a totally secular government (it's in
the Constitution, you know), is going to define those moral absolutes? 

Behavioral limitations are okay by me, so long as it described the act, and
not the moral status of the actor.

>  Too bad.  Those of us who love the Lord and who love
> America will NEVER let liberals destroy our country, nor will we ever
> step into the closests which the homosexuals stepped out of.  WE WILL
> NOT BE QUIET SO THAT LIBERALS CAN HAVE THEIR WAY WITH OUR COUNTRY!

You do know that by your constant attacks on a definition of "liberal" which
seems to be peculiar exclusively to yourself, you shame the name of secular
Conservatism.

I'm extremely conservative, however, I do not share your religious views. And
as you seem to be unable to understand that not all Conservatives are
Christians (though many are), you also seem to be unable to understand that
not all Christian Conservatives are religious bigots such as you, sadly, seem
to be.

-- 
    Be kind to your neighbors, even though they be transgenic chimerae.
          Re-transmission of this e-mail expressly prohibited. 
  Non-UseNet re-transmission of this article is a willful violation of US
 Copyright Law and the Berne Convention. Statutory damages are $250,000.00
Whom thou'st vex'd waxeth wroth: Meow.      http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/