🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <35D9B7C7.1293@home.com>, here@home.com says...
> Thus spake a Pervert:
> > 
> > If you believe that abortion is wrong, then I heartily support your not
> > having an abortion.  I also support your not compelling anyone else to
> > have an abortion.   The difference is that I am not seeking to impose my
> > religious/moral/spiritual perspective on you.  Is this so hard for you
> > to understand, half a brain or otherwise?  And since I am a male, I find
> > it highly presumptive to dictate to any woman what she should, or should
> > not be compelled to do with their bodies. (And for the record, I am a
> > fiscally conservative, non-dictatorial Republican.  There are such
> > creatures in the world.)
> > 
> First, no one in this country has the absolute right to do whatever they
> want with their bodies.  There are numerous ways one can use their body
> to commit unlawful acts.
> Second, in an abortion there are *two* bodies involved, not just the one
> of the woman.  (A fetus is not a part of the female anatomy).
> Third, prohibiting is not the same as compelling.  If a woman does not
> choose to give birth she can simply avoid pregnancy.  (Just find out
> what
> causes it and don't do it).
> 

So when did we become a soviet socialist state where our bodies are property of 
the state? It really is not about abortion, since this concept of state 
ownership of our bodies goes beyond abortion, when "experts", "actvists", and 
police constantly try to control our bodies even against the will of the 
voters, such as all the attempts to void the medical marijuana initative vs. 
bureacratic rule making, or FDA attempt to regulate the vitamin industry, etc.

Most of these so called unlawful acts are basically religious crimes that 
offend self-appointed protectors of morality, who use lies and mis-information 
to panic the general public.