🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:11:10 GMT, Jonathan Ball
<jonball@whitehouse.net> wrote:

>rander3127@aol.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 07:39:27 -0800, Bob <chil-out@ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>That's Hollywood.  Liberalism is one thing, but business is
>>>>business.  Do as I say, not as I do.  Pot calling kettle black,
>>>>etc, etc.  And the Jewish people seem astonished that Blacks might
>>>>be upset with them from time to time.
>>>>-Rich
>>>
>>>You were doing OK up till the hate shit.  Then, you fell apart.
>>>Bob
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hate?  Try reality.  But denial is another bulwark of leftism.
>> You think the Hollywoodites look for ways to cast minorities?
>> They look for ways to minimize their presence.
>
>That there is animosity from blacks towards Jews is 
>undeniable.  I think blacks can be forgiven for 
>thinking that Jews treat them in a patronizing manner. 
>  A Jewish woman I once dated routinely referred to 
>blacks as "schwuggies" (SHVOO-geez), a corruption of 
>the Yiddish "schwartz" (black).  It was not intended as 
>a term of endearment, although she vociferously - 
>protesteth too much? - denied that it represented bigotry.
>
>It isn't just Hollywood that looks to pigeonhole 
>minorities to the point of marginalizing them.  There 
>was a National Public Radio bit several weeks ago about 
>the glamour magazines' near-total refusal to put black 
>models on the covers of magazines like Cosmopolitan and 
>Glamour and Vogue.  There was a reason for it, of 
>course:  magazine sales dipped severely if they did put 
>a black model or actor on the cover, even a 
>"white"-looking black like Halle Berry.  But, so much 
>for the willingness of the "liberal" media to fight for 
>justice.
>
>However, Rich, hard-ass right-wing conservatives are 
>every bit as adept at the denial game as leftists.

No, it's soft-C conservatives who are.  Hard-ass right wingers
tend to be upfront about what they believe.
-Rich