🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: la.transportation
Article #101

Re: California High Speed Rail.

#101
From: Lüko Willms
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:53
25 lines
2877 bytes
Am Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:45:02 UTC,  schrieb Stephen Sprunk 
<stephen@sprunk.org>  auf misc.transport.rail.misc :

> Foreign tourists would be used to not having checked baggage, since the 
> trains in most other countries don't have it either -- and no HSR system 
> on the planet does, AFAIK.  It's simply not needed frequently enough for 
> operators to deal with the hassle.

  Well, in earlier decades, one could well check in baggage for a 
train and take it right after arrival. But train companies have done 
away with it in order to cut costs. In West Germany this happened 1991
with the putting into service of the first ICE trains. They no longer 
had a luggage car in the train, different to loco hauled trains used 
before. It would, of course, also cost dwelling time at the station if
the individual pieces of luggage would have to be lifted into and out 
of the luggage car; a system of containers would be needed by which 
one could move everything for and from a station in just one swoop. 


Cheers, 
L.W.


-- -----------------------------------------------------
Jetzt die Banken nationalisieren, nicht subventionieren!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <czd2LKcn8EGd-pn2-eFg0Y6hPZdve@lueko.willms.dialin.t-online.de>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
References: <gesom9$gfa$1@registered.motzarella.org> <mmullen8014-B2D579.18134408112008@netnews.mchsi.com> <nospam-C53124.21283508112008@mara100-84.onlink.net> <CEuRk.6506$yr3.4738@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> <gf5tu7$tn0$1@blue.rahul.net> <yc2dnZiPPd4MMYvUnZ2dnUVZ8sGdnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <0snfh49obg3tmpeljs5qu1jk5brqpdin55@4ax.com> <5eydnaxjVNeqdorUnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <_0XRk.6590$yr3.2005@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> <nospam-A8D40A.09450110112008@mara100-84.onlink.net> <Ok6Sk.5908$as4.5821@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f59f9,eaa028fe7501658d
X-Google-Thread: 101735,eaa028fe7501658d
X-Google-Thread: 1093a2,eaa028fe7501658d
X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,eaa028fe7501658d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,gid101735,gid1093a2,gidfd3ff,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: "Lüko Willms" <l.willms@domain.invalid>
Newsgroups: la.transportation,misc.transport.rail.americas,misc.transport.rail.misc,ba.transportation
Subject: Re: California High Speed Rail.
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:53:37 +0100
Organization: Keine
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <czd2LKcn8EGd-pn2-eFg0Y6hPZdve@lueko.willms.dialin.t-online.de>
References: <gesom9$gfa$1@registered.motzarella.org> <mmullen8014-B2D579.18134408112008@netnews.mchsi.com> <nospam-C53124.21283508112008@mara100-84.onlink.net> <CEuRk.6506$yr3.4738@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> <gf5tu7$tn0$1@blue.rahul.net> <yc2dnZiPPd4MMYvUnZ2dnUVZ8sGdnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <0snfh49obg3tmpeljs5qu1jk5brqpdin55@4ax.com> <5eydnaxjVNeqdorUnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet> <_0XRk.6590$yr3.2005@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> <nospam-A8D40A.09450110112008@mara100-84.onlink.net> <Ok6Sk.5908$as4.5821@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>
Reply-To: lueko.willms@t-online.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1226555617 01 n26615 1-nUl9irVsmpHwy 081113 05:53:37
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: bEKLsOZFYetc+EaJDExBzA8oockin7LQ1FjnGJevaQS-j31ZB1bvY2
User-Agent: ProNews/2 V1.60.cp125