Article View: la.transportation
Article #109Re: California High Speed Rail.
From: Hatunen
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:38
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:38
31 lines
2857 bytes
2857 bytes
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:37:05 -0800, Steve Fenwick <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <133ch45n7cjp39gkofg62fsh53an6jp38d@4ax.com>, > Hatunen <hatunen@cox.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:16:26 -0600, Stephen Sprunk >> <stephen@sprunk.org> wrote: >> >> >> >The problem isn't stations or interchange of passengers; the problem is >> >that many parts of the ROW aren't wide enough for four tracks, which >> >means that if commuter and HSR trains can't share, one or the other will >> >have to be single-tracked part of the way, which hurts capacity and >> >causes any late trains to snowball. >> >> You mean "at this time many parts of the ROW aren't wide enough >> for four tracks". HSR will obviously have rights of eminent >> domain and would be able to acquire sufficient land to provide >> the extra ROW. > >There's no way that they will be allowed to seize without payment new >ROW from San Francisco to San Jose. The land is just too valuable; there >would be a huge hue and cry. Um. Do you know what "eminent domain" means? -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4mlfh41ar2q2ha82tk40gv70f93qlfq6s4@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.acm.uiuc.edu!news.xcski.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<gesom9$gfa$1@registered.motzarella.org> <ba2ee435-8d2a-44ff-904b-17ae23376c4f@p35g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <get2hn$pf3$1@registered.motzarella.org> <874p2lj1aw.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <6nepgvFl6qijU1@mid.individual.net> <birQk.5835$c45.3389@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com> <czd2LKcn8EGd-pn2-EdvnwU7CE6TD@lueko.willms.dialin.t-online.de> <%B%Qk.5900$x%.4215@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <133ch45n7cjp39gkofg62fsh53an6jp38d@4ax.com> <nospam-FC2FF2.16370508112008@mara100-84.onlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f59f9,eaa028fe7501658d X-Google-Thread: 101735,eaa028fe7501658d X-Google-Thread: 1093a2,eaa028fe7501658d X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,eaa028fe7501658d X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,gid101735,gid1093a2,gidfd3ff,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.acm.uiuc.edu!news.xcski.com!not-for-mail From: Hatunen <hatunen@cox.net> Newsgroups: la.transportation,misc.transport.rail.americas,misc.transport.rail.misc,ba.transportation Subject: Re: California High Speed Rail. Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:38:21 -0700 Organization: As little as possible Lines: 31 Message-ID: <4mlfh41ar2q2ha82tk40gv70f93qlfq6s4@4ax.com> References: <gesom9$gfa$1@registered.motzarella.org> <ba2ee435-8d2a-44ff-904b-17ae23376c4f@p35g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <get2hn$pf3$1@registered.motzarella.org> <874p2lj1aw.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <6nepgvFl6qijU1@mid.individual.net> <birQk.5835$c45.3389@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com> <czd2LKcn8EGd-pn2-EdvnwU7CE6TD@lueko.willms.dialin.t-online.de> <%B%Qk.5900$x%.4215@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <133ch45n7cjp39gkofg62fsh53an6jp38d@4ax.com> <nospam-FC2FF2.16370508112008@mara100-84.onlink.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip70-176-18-177.ph.ph.cox.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: xen1.xcski.com 1226299102 13867 70.176.18.177 (10 Nov 2008 06:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@xcski.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:38:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118