Article View: la.transportation
Article #1990Re: WI Los Angeles was to be evacuated? (was: Re: Lack of alternate routes
From: Gunner
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:59
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:59
28 lines
2575 bytes
2575 bytes
On 7 Jun 2004 06:18:27 -0700, balanco01@yahoo.com (Proprclr) wrote: > > This brings up an interesting question: What if Los Angeles had to be >evacuated, how would you do it, and what would be the dangers one >would have to look out for? I'm thinking gangs, looters, people going >crazy and shooting other people, that kind of thing. And what about >roads? Seems freeways would be out of the question, scince everyone is trying >to get out at once. Off road? Maybe in the moutains, but most would still >have to get through the urban areas first. If the disaster didn't involve >earthquakes (tsunamies), wouldn't it be much safer to sail out to sea >if you could? Simple fact of life...Los Angeles Cannot be evacuated. Period. End Program, Full Stop. Way too many people over too vast an area. Even I have had to make a number of alternative bugout plans for a evac event. And while Im sneaky and devious..there are few options open depending on where Im at in the LA basin if things turn to shit. Gunner That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there. - George Orwell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2td9c0p0r73v2c2f53enca51lb60j3k21e@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70ec1bab!not-for-mailReferences:
<z9nwc.80135$gG2.2932@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> <3565c0poethts2igfjp3canm7c3a5s418k@4ax.com> <mcmurtri-E6CF3C.14151706062004@corp-radius.supernews.com> <cb8bd93a.0406070518.5b427eb@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f59f9,9ac5d179c0776fe2 X-Google-Thread: 10001a,9ac5d179c0776fe2 X-Google-Thread: 10e901,6c38021ab5eb08a2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,gid10001a,gid10e901,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!70ec1bab!not-for-mail From: Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> Newsgroups: la.transportation,ca.driving,misc.survivalism Subject: Re: WI Los Angeles was to be evacuated? (was: Re: Lack of alternate routes Organization: Coyote Engineering Reply-To: gunner@lightspeed.net Message-ID: <2td9c0p0r73v2c2f53enca51lb60j3k21e@4ax.com> References: <z9nwc.80135$gG2.2932@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> <3565c0poethts2igfjp3canm7c3a5s418k@4ax.com> <mcmurtri-E6CF3C.14151706062004@corp-radius.supernews.com> <cb8bd93a.0406070518.5b427eb@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:59:54 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.244.37.154 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net 1086634794 216.244.37.154 (Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:59:54 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:59:54 PDT