Article View: la.transportation
Article #1997Re: WI Los Angeles was to be evacuated? (was: Re: Lack of alternate routes
From: Tim May
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:43
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 02:43
30 lines
3044 bytes
3044 bytes
In article <7od9c0h2bpk8t9t6h9g2hsrs1tedul7b8b@4ax.com>, Watched <TheWatched@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:33:34 -0700, Robert Cot� <tscn@adelph.net> > wrote: > > > > >> In the case of a truly serious disaster, however, they'd double their > >> outbound capacities and they'd be one-way roads. > >> > Which worked really "well" during the firestorms last year in San > Diego and San Bernardino... NOT ! Those fires were very localized. Despite the television coverage you may have seen, and the impression you may have gotten, relatively few people were "unable to escape." And most of these deaths happened in the first full day of the fire, Sunday, when many had been ignoring warnings. I know the areas, having hiking in the Stonewall Jackson Peak area in the 1950s and having lived in and around San Diego later. Also, my parents lived in the 70s and 80s not far from the Simi Valley area where the fires were big events later in the week (around Valencia/Canyon Country/etc.) By "truly serious disaster," we mean widespread evaculations, not just telling a particular street or couple of streets to leave. --Tim May
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<070620041943009355%timcmay@removethis.got.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!HSNX.atgi.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.got.net!news.got.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<z9nwc.80135$gG2.2932@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> <3565c0poethts2igfjp3canm7c3a5s418k@4ax.com> <mcmurtri-E6CF3C.14151706062004@corp-radius.supernews.com> <cb8bd93a.0406070518.5b427eb@posting.google.com> <v4t8c091iir0nhsljraj238giliinf26lj@4ax.com> <10c93h84silepe0@corp.supernews.com> <tscn-2205D5.09333407062004@isp.dca.giganews.com> <7od9c0h2bpk8t9t6h9g2hsrs1tedul7b8b@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f59f9,9ac5d179c0776fe2 X-Google-Thread: 10001a,9ac5d179c0776fe2 X-Google-Thread: 10e901,6c38021ab5eb08a2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,gid10001a,gid10e901,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!HSNX.atgi.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.196.106.144!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.got.net!news.got.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:43:06 -0500 Subject: Re: WI Los Angeles was to be evacuated? (was: Re: Lack of alternate routes Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:43:00 -0700 From: Tim May <timcmay@removethis.got.net> Newsgroups: la.transportation,ca.driving,misc.survivalism Message-ID: <070620041943009355%timcmay@removethis.got.net> References: <z9nwc.80135$gG2.2932@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> <3565c0poethts2igfjp3canm7c3a5s418k@4ax.com> <mcmurtri-E6CF3C.14151706062004@corp-radius.supernews.com> <cb8bd93a.0406070518.5b427eb@posting.google.com> <v4t8c091iir0nhsljraj238giliinf26lj@4ax.com> <10c93h84silepe0@corp.supernews.com> <tscn-2205D5.09333407062004@isp.dca.giganews.com> <7od9c0h2bpk8t9t6h9g2hsrs1tedul7b8b@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Thoth/1.6.0 (Carbon/OS X) Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.19.185.59 X-Trace: sv3-pJCGu8nIuCEenl4qJgL3mAKMKlABMobvHPVePDnOOk8QyHo5MOMVg/mwhXRGPemZZ017SswsTCn3f7t!0jOnrxlGnozmbhfB1lmd5UoNLgVJ35skiBaMcVrI8doJ+N0RrGSvyTbrhtdzVLRv6YfuC5r0Iml2!a85xGzg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@got.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@got.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1