Article View: la.transportation
Article #2811Re: Secession Idea
From: R_G
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00
10 lines
1431 bytes
1431 bytes
Isn't Universal City, and the tax revenue it represents, part of the County, not the City of Los Angeles? Like an unincorporated area? Michael Higby wrote: > Valley. Both of these communities have stated that they would like > Universal Studios to be part of the city they are a part of, preferably > Los Angeles, but the leaders of the secession movement say no why, > obviously knowing that a new San Fernando Valley city needs that tax > revenue.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6g1doe$2e7$1@usenet40.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3523F5AB.3F8A@pacbell.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,3f4966f3984f700a X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,3f4966f3984f700a X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: 1123cb,3f4966f3984f700a X-Google-Attributes: gid1123cb,public X-Google-Thread: f59f9,3f4966f3984f700a X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,3f4966f3984f700a X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public From: R_G <rgrenader~@~earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Secession Idea Date: 1998/04/02 Message-ID: <6g1doe$2e7$1@usenet40.supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 340373508 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3523F5AB.3F8A@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Trace: 891566670 GRQT55BHRE904CFD9 usenet40.supernews.com Organization: Remove silly characters to reply Newsgroups: la.transportation,la.general,la.news,ca.general,alt.california