Article View: la.transportation
Article #320Re: FWD: Legislator Is Driven to Lift Limits on Carpool Lanes
From: John David Galt
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:55
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:55
57 lines
4042 bytes
4042 bytes
David Masterson wrote: > > >>>>> Rick Damiani writes: > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:54:38 GMT, Tlittle <mail@mail.net> wrote: > > > This: > > >> "L.A. has gridlock at all times on most all of our freeways, and > >> this would obviously ease congestion," he said, "especially if > >> there was a stalled car, minor accident or freeway repairs during > >> non-rush hours." > > > and this: > > >> "I have numerous times been stuck in a traffic jam where it's the > >> middle of the day and the HOV lanes are being used by only a few > >> motorists," he said. > > > are why such a change is unlikely. Identifying peak traffic times > > in L.A. is pointless, as most of the freeways are in a > > near-perpetual state of congestion. > > How close is this to also being true for the San Francisco Bay Area? That depends what you define as the Bay Area. I've seen substantial "extended rush-hours" (weekday morning and night) in two kinds of places: 1) Highways that go out to exurbs, especially where there is only one good route to the area (examples: 101 from Novato to Santa Rosa, 80 near the Carquinez Bridge and beyond it, 580-205 from Dublin to Tracy, 101 south of San Jose, and 152 east of Gilroy where it's only two lanes). These get crowded as early as 5 AM and can stay that way until 9 or 10 PM. 2) Bottlenecks within the Bay Area where there is a lot of traffic from people going shopping or to evening entertainment, as well as the commuters. 880 and 680 between Fremont and San Jose have this pattern, as do 237 and Montague Expwy. going across to connect to 880 and 680. The freeways in the Walnut Creek area also have it, because they all run together (onto 680 through WC, and also onto 4 out toward Antioch). Highway 101 in Marin and Sonoma counties, and 17 south of San Jose, fit both categories because each is a major bottleneck that needed widening years ago and no good alternative route exists for either. Many of the roads listed in 1) jam up on weekends also (outbound on Saturday morning and, especially badly, inbound Sunday night), as Bay Area residents head for parks and recreation outside the Bay Area. Only a few of these (mostly category 2) are as bad as the average freeway I've encountered in southern California, but they will certainly get there if nothing is done. And because each of these routes tends to be used as only one middle section of a long trip, with a wide variety of origins and destinations, it's very unlikely that any form of public transit will help, unless it carries your car along with you.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3C17E07C.4077B031@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp-cust.primenet.com!feedwest.news.agis.net!aleron.net!news.mainstreet.net!wasp.rahul.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!not-for-mailReferences:
<3C1656A3.8B2CCCC@mail.net> <cb0d1u889qmf3apbnbfimbcrq1bv4el3j2@4ax.com> <upu5l42wi.fsf@synopsys.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,ba2409bf83ba986c X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public X-Google-Thread: f59f9,ba2409bf83ba986c X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,public X-Google-Thread: 10ca13,ba2409bf83ba986c X-Google-Attributes: gid10ca13,public X-Google-Thread: 10001a,ba2409bf83ba986c X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-12 14:57:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp-cust.primenet.com!feedwest.news.agis.net!aleron.net!news.mainstreet.net!wasp.rahul.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!not-for-mail From: John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> Newsgroups: la.transportation,ba.transportation,ca.driving,misc.transport.urban-transit Subject: Re: FWD: Legislator Is Driven to Lift Limits on Carpool Lanes Followup-To: ca.driving Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:55:56 -0800 Organization: Diogenes the Cynic Hot-Tubbing Society Lines: 57 Message-ID: <3C17E07C.4077B031@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> References: <3C1656A3.8B2CCCC@mail.net> <cb0d1u889qmf3apbnbfimbcrq1bv4el3j2@4ax.com> <upu5l42wi.fsf@synopsys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72-168.018.popsite.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,fr,es,de,it