Article View: la.transportation
Article #644Re: Electrification
From: Pierre A Plauzoles
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00
33 lines
2804 bytes
2804 bytes
Merritt Mullen wrote: > Pierre A Plauzoles at plauzolesp@bigvalley.net wrote on 10/5/00 9:01 PM: > > > Hello. > > > > The subject of electrification of Metrolink has come up ocasionally and > > San Francisco's Peninsula line will probably be electrified within a few > > years. When this is done, new locomotives will have to be bought. Has > > the decision been made as to what model to buy for San Francisco? > > I think you are a bit premature. By the time the Peninsula is electrified > (5-10 years?), the choice of electric locomotive might look entirely > different than it does today. Perhaps the service will switch to EMUs and > not require locomotives. Of course, they probably would want to use the > current cars and that would require locomotives. > > You suggested E60s. I thought E60s were considered to be troublemakers on > the NEC. It seems the preferred loco is the AEM-7, used by both Amtrak and > MARC, and both are happy with it. These are E60c-2s. I haven't heard how happy (or unhappy) Deseret Western [Rangely, in northwestern Colorado to some isolated one-bar (?) town in northeastern Utah] is with theirs, but then they and BMLP -- and TXU (Martin Lake, Texas), the gas -and-electricity utility that serves a good sized chunk of Texas and is headquartered in Dallas -- have picked up some of them. Out of the original 39 ordered, 15 have been sold, and 20 were left as of last August. I wonder what is left now out of those 20 and where they are. Incidentally, depending on the color scheme and how they maintain the locos, those Martin Lake units ought to be good targets for photographers on the lake: the electrics probably go over the bridge (which is some 1500 feet long, if I recall the map scale properly) southeast of the power plant. Anyone know for sure?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<39DD6DFD.6EE1F862@bigvalley.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<39DD4E82.BFA16DFB@bigvalley.net> <B602A805.2A825%mmullen@ispchannel.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,81124eb118fe16a2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public X-Google-Thread: f59f9,81124eb118fe16a2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf59f9,public From: Pierre A Plauzoles <plauzolesp@bigvalley.net> Subject: Re: Electrification Date: 2000/10/05 Message-ID: <39DD6DFD.6EE1F862@bigvalley.net> X-Deja-AN: 678175430 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <39DD4E82.BFA16DFB@bigvalley.net> <B602A805.2A825%mmullen@ispchannel.com> X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.93.82.172 X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@news7.crl.com X-Trace: news7.crl.com 970810346 52310 209.60.252.11 (6 Oct 2000 05:32:26 GMT) Organization: CRL Network Services X-Original-Trace: 5 Oct 2000 23:16:03 -0700, 63.93.82.172 Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sphinxangelorum@bigfoot.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Oct 2000 05:32:26 GMT Newsgroups: la.transportation,ba.transportation