Re: SparcServer 20: Linux or Solaris 8 ?

Article View: linux.redhat.sparc

Article #3

Back to linux.redhat.sparc Previous Next

From: James Lockwood
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:00

29 lines
2512 bytes

Mike Spooner (mike.spooner@hil.hftrust.com) wrote:
: The dual-CPU SM52 modules actually ran at 45MHz, thus limiting the MBus to
: 40MHz.

orion:/home/users/james% /usr/sbin/psrinfo -v
Status of processor 0 as of: 02/23/00 12:42:03
  Processor has been on-line since 02/19/00 22:06:00.
  The sparc processor operates at 50 MHz,
        and has a sparc floating point processor.
Status of processor 1 as of: 02/23/00 12:42:03
  Processor has been on-line since 02/19/00 22:09:00.
  The sparc processor operates at 50 MHz,
        and has a sparc floating point processor.
Status of processor 2 as of: 02/23/00 12:42:03
  Processor has been on-line since 02/19/00 22:09:00.
  The sparc processor operates at 50 MHz,
        and has a sparc floating point processor.
Status of processor 3 as of: 02/23/00 12:42:03
  Processor has been on-line since 02/19/00 22:10:00.
  The sparc processor operates at 50 MHz,
        and has a sparc floating point processor.

They run at 50MHz like the SM51's, and like the SM51's can only support
a maximum MBus speed of 40MHz (as the MBus speed must be less than the
CPU speed).

There were 45MHz SuperSparcs but only a very small number.

-James

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MHXs4.12097$Ev4.286831@nnrp1-w.snfc21.pbi.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<87n3gj$dl4$0@dosa.alt.net> <389F1D76.6A69844A@erols.com> <87na18$kon$1@provolone.cs.utexas.edu> <p8br4.28661$3b6.132797@ozemail.com.au> <88kjm8$1ck$1@jedi.apana.org.au> <01bf7e25$3adcc5a0$abc548c2@flob>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4671,2266b34c6ab7c5f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public
X-Google-Thread: fd924,2266b34c6ab7c5f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd924,public
X-Google-Thread: f6653,2266b34c6ab7c5f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6653,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d053,c5d57b57321a0531
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public
X-Google-Thread: 11035d,2266b34c6ab7c5f
X-Google-Attributes: gid11035d,public
From: james@foonly.com (James Lockwood)
Subject: Re: SparcServer 20: Linux or Solaris 8 ?
Date: 2000/02/23
Message-ID: <MHXs4.12097$Ev4.286831@nnrp1-w.snfc21.pbi.net>
X-Deja-AN: 588987278
References: <87n3gj$dl4$0@dosa.alt.net> <389F1D76.6A69844A@erols.com> <87na18$kon$1@provolone.cs.utexas.edu> <p8br4.28661$3b6.132797@ozemail.com.au> <88kjm8$1ck$1@jedi.apana.org.au> <01bf7e25$3adcc5a0$abc548c2@flob>
Followup-To: linux.redhat.sparc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc,aus.computers.sun
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: nnrp1-w.snfc21.pbi.net 951338860 207.215.187.27 (Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:47:40 PST)
Organization: The Electric Mayhem
X-Foonly: 36 bits forever!
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:47:40 PST
Newsgroups: linux.redhat.sparc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc,aus.computers.sun

Reply to Parent Message