Article View: list.future-l
Article #13Re: The fall of Bitnet
From: Roger Fajman
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1990 01:00
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1990 01:00
18 lines
1257 bytes
1257 bytes
> Alain, I see nothing in your mail that deserves flaming. I find your > line of thought quite correct. My personal opinion is that the important > services provided by NJE style services should be ported to the > Internet. I personally believe that, in the very long term, NJE as > a protocol for internetworking will not be needed. I believe these > services will be incorporated into TCP/OSI applications and > the world will eventually speak the same language (swahili). > > /mrg I also agree with this line of reasoning. Convincing the powers that be in the Internet that they can learn anything from BITNET could be a difficult task though. Roger (I agreed with Michael AGAIN???? Better check this out -- seems about as likely as the Berlin Wall coming down. :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90Feb27.200429est.57386@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!BITNIC!FUTURE-LShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!BITNIC!FUTURE-L Date: Tue, 27 Feb 90 20:00:07 EST Reply-To: BITNET Futures List <FUTURE-L@BITNIC.bitnet> Sender: BITNET Futures List <FUTURE-L@BITNIC.bitnet> From: Roger Fajman <RAF@NIHCU.bitnet> Subject: Re: The fall of Bitnet To: UofToronto LAN redistribution <FUTURE-L@UTORGPU.uucp> Message-ID: <90Feb27.200429est.57386@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca> Newsgroups: list.future-l Distribution: ut Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu