Re: Unix folks unhappy about bit groups

Article View: list.netnws-l

Article #2

From: Irwin Tillman
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 00:43

7 lines
1057 bytes

Thanks for your edit/repost of the discussion in nntp-managers, Linda.

Perhaps it would helpful to go back to the original reasoning behind
the selection of the groupnames.  I was involved in that discussion;
it took place in NETNWS-L and LSTSRV-L during the last week of 9/87
and the first week or so of 10/87.  The NOTEBOOKs for those two months
should be available from Listserv.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <90Feb12.200051est.58201@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca!NDSUVM1!NETNWS-L

References: Message of Mon, 12 Feb 90 17:28:00 EST from <LRL@PSUVM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca!NDSUVM1!NETNWS-L
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 90 19:43:46 EST
Reply-To: NETNWS-L Netnews List <NETNWS-L%NDSUVM1.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Sender: NETNWS-L Netnews List <NETNWS-L%NDSUVM1.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
From: Irwin Tillman <IRWIN%PUCC.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Subject:      Re: Unix folks unhappy about bit groups
To: UofToronto LAN redistribution <NETNWS-L%UTORGPU.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
References:  Message of Mon, 12 Feb 90 17:28:00 EST from <LRL@PSUVM>
Message-ID: <90Feb12.200051est.58201@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Newsgroups: list.netnws-l
Distribution: ut
Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

Reply to Parent Message