Re: More on WWV/WWVH timecode generators

Article View: list.ntp

Article #12

#12

From: clements
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1990 21:23

14 lines
890 bytes

> [...] I'd like to find out if this is in fact the format allegedly used
> on WWVB now. [...]
> Dave

WWVB's format is quite different.  The MSB-to-LSB of each digit is
reversed, the UT1 sign bit is three bits, and all the fields are
in different parts of the minute.

As to whether the Leap and Year info is there, I have tried again
to read WWVB under the line noise, under different local weather
(moisture) conditions and had no luck.

/Rcc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9002272209.AA04363@trantor.umd.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!trantor.umd.edu!ntp-relay

References: Your message of Tue, 27 Feb 90 20:08:12 +0000.

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!trantor.umd.edu!ntp-relay
Message-ID: <9002272209.AA04363@trantor.umd.edu>
To: Mills@udel.edu
Cc: clements@BBN.COM, ntp@trantor.umd.edu, winter@apple.com
Subject: Re: More on WWV/WWVH timecode generators 
References: Your message of Tue, 27 Feb 90 20:08:12 +0000.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 90 16:23:58 EST
From: clements@BBN.COM
Newsgroups: list.ntp
Distribution: ut
Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

Reply to Parent Message