🚀 go-pugleaf

Pascal Geuns wrote:
> 
> Michael Zedeler wrote:
> >
> > Det var dog den mest userioese undersoegelse, jeg har hoert om i lange
> > tider.
> > Hvis den skal vaere objektiv, kan du ikke begynde at publicere resultaterne,
> > foer den er afsluttet.
> >
> > Det er vel en del af din uddannelse, not?
> >
> > Mvh. Michael.
> 
> If you would have taken a look at my latest graphs, then you could see
> that the posting you are refering to did not influence my results in a
> negative way.

If you are using the word "negative", it is clear that you are biased. What does the 
word "negative" refer to?

> Comparing the visit/participation rate of the Danish WWW user with the
> non Danish WWW user, you will clearly see that the Danes are more
> reservated concerning their participation in the survey.

But your survey also shows that 33.3% heard about this survey on news-net.

> The only thing this posting was aiming at and also achieved, was to get
> a better visit/participation ratio for the Danish visitors.

I have been browsing your survey for a while now, and it seems to be written entirely 
in danish. What did I miss?

I think it is a very good idea making this survey and all, though I am aware of 
several surveys made in Denmark roughly a year ago. What worries me is that your older 
postings were targeted at a certain group of people (danes wanting to see more danish 
www sites). Such a request will result in a skew in the samples. Why the heck 
shouldn't people react?

Michael.

BTW: Why are we writing english?