🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: local.soc.forsale
4 messages
4 total messages Started by Lynn M. Reidinger Fri, 28 Aug 1992 15:03
JEWLERY FOR SALE- BIG, BIG DISCOUNT
#7
Author: Lynn M. Reidinger
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 15:03
35 lines
2169 bytes
One 18k yellow gold ladies diamond ring. The diamond is an oval shape
weighing 1.07 carats and has superior color with an approximate grade of D
and excellent clarity with an approximate grade of VS-2. The oval measures
8.3mm x 5.8mm.
The diamond is set in 14k white gold four prong head on an 18k yellow gold
diamond band. Going down the shank are ten baguettes, five on a side, for an
approximate total weight of .76 carats. On the top and bottom of the oval are
eight full-cut diamonds, four on a side, for an approximate total weight of
.28 carats. The baguettes are all channel set and the full-cuts are prong set.
The diamonds have excellent color with an approximate grade of H-I and
excellent clarity with an approximate grade of VS. The ring weighs 6.51 grams.
APPRAISED REPLACEMENT VALUE: $13,500.00. ASKING $7,000.00 or best offer.

One 18k yellow gold ladies wedding band. The band follows the design of the
engagement ring. This band is 3mm wide and weighs 4.76 grams.
APPRAISED REPLACEMENT VALUE: $225.00. ASKING $100.00 or best offer.

**************************************************************************


Ladies diamond tennis bracelet containing round diamonds weighing approx. 1.0
carat. H color, SI clarity.
APPRAISED REPLACEMENT VALUE: $1,650.00. ASKING $900.00 or best offer.

Ladies sapphire tennis bracelet containing sapphires with a total weight of
3.0 carats.
APPRAISED REPLACEMENT VALUE: $1,200.00. ASKING $550.00 or best offer.

Call Lynn at (708)632-7594 until 9/10/92. After 9/10/92, call Jon at
(312)876-0894.

e-mail reidingr@motcid.rtsg.mot.com

e-mail address is only good until 9/10/92. No forwarding address available.
Re: JEWLERY FOR SALE- BIG, BIG DISCOUNT
#8
Author: Kurt Guntheroth
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 15:46
12 lines
1104 bytes
reidingr@rtsg.mot.com (Lynn M. Reidinger) writes:

>One 18k yellow gold ladies diamond ring. The diamond is an oval shape
>weighing 1.07 carats and has superior color with an approximate grade of D
>and excellent clarity with an approximate grade of VS-2. The oval measures
>8.3mm x 5.8mm.

While color D would be a very clear diamond, a clarity grade of VS-2 is only
one step above "coal" and would hardly be considered "excellent clarity".
An oval cut diamond of clarity VS-2 may be less than exciting.

Just a little note about buying jewelry on usenet.
Re: JEWLERY FOR SALE- BIG, BIG DISCOUNT
#9
Author: Neil Williams
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:31
29 lines
1606 bytes
In article <1992Sep2.154641.8389@tc.fluke.COM> kurt@tc.fluke.COM (Kurt Guntheroth) writes:
>reidingr@rtsg.mot.com (Lynn M. Reidinger) writes:
>
>>One 18k yellow gold ladies diamond ring. The diamond is an oval shape
>>weighing 1.07 carats and has superior color with an approximate grade of D
>>and excellent clarity with an approximate grade of VS-2. The oval measures
>>8.3mm x 5.8mm.
>
>While color D would be a very clear diamond, a clarity grade of VS-2 is only
>one step above "coal" and would hardly be considered "excellent clarity".
>An oval cut diamond of clarity VS-2 may be less than exciting.

"One step above coal"???  Doesn't the rating go:

I, SI, VS1, VS2, VVS1, VVS2, IF, F?

This would put VS2 a few steps above "coal".

Not defending the original poster's price - which I think is about
50% too high, just don't want folks with VS2 to feel bad.

--Neil


-- 
Neil Williams: neilw@informix.com

Seen on my last trip on United: "If you are seated in an exit row 
and can not (sic) read this card... please notify a crew member."
Re: JEWLERY FOR SALE- BIG, BIG DISCOUNT
#10
Author: Colette George
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 13:23
26 lines
1964 bytes
In article <1992Sep2.154641.8389@tc.fluke.COM>, kurt@tc.fluke.COM (Kurt Guntheroth) writes:
|> 
|> While color D would be a very clear diamond, a clarity grade of VS-2 is only
|> one step above "coal" and would hardly be considered "excellent clarity".
|> An oval cut diamond of clarity VS-2 may be less than exciting.
|> 
|> Just a little note about buying jewelry on usenet.

A diamond with D-colour and clarity VS-2 may be an excellent diamond depending 
on where the inclusions are located on the stone.  Generally, colour and cut 
are far more important to the "look" of a stone than clarity (unless, of 
course, you can actually see the inclusions).  If the stone in question has a 
good make, there would be little difference to the naked eye between a D-colour
diamond with VS-2 clarity, and a D-colour diamond with VVS1 clarity.

By the way, VS-2 isn't one step above "coal".  I believe there are 3 grades 
below VS-2 (namely, I-1, I-2, and I-3).  VS-2 is still in a "good" range 
for jewelry because you cannot see the inclusions with the naked eye, but you
are correct that VS-2 is not considered "excellent clarity".  

-- 
===================================================================
Colette George 			
Bell-Northern Research Ltd. 	Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Internet:  colette@bnr.ca 
===================================================================
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads