🚀 go-pugleaf

Barbara Amero wrote:
> 
> Buzz, why are you picking on feminists by so narrowly defining me?
> 
> buchan@spamsucks@direct.ca (earl)
> frankpoole@sympatico.ca wrote:
> 
> >What do you people think?
> 
> : Barbara is a disturbed individual -
> 
> earl, what do you mean by that? Are you suggesting that I'm mentally ill?
> Are you libeling me? If that is what you are saying, then you are
> libeling me.

He's got a lot of support in that opinion. 

<<snip>>

> Perhaps Michelle doesn't find it in her "sheltered (protected)" life,
> going for walks in the evening with hubby and "normally" driving
> everywhere else, as she stated. Michelle says she has found that "if you
> are not looking for trouble, you usually don't find any". And with the
> next key stroke says she wants to help women. I don't think Michelle
> is disturbed. I think she is just uninformed, in denial, and protecting
> the practice of masculinity. Michelle's beliefs, attitudes, opinions do
> not help women; they harm women.

What a load of garbage. Michelle has made some reasonable rational posts
and you have attempted to trash her personally because she disagrees
with you and your tactics. She seems to be a bright, intelligent woman
especially when contrasted againg Ms. Amero (but Ms. Amero can make
anyone look good in comparison).


-- 
Gord, Sue & Countess McKenzie
"Anyone with brains knows not to take anything
posted here too seriously, it's a sandbox for adults."