🚀 go-pugleaf

Gordon McKenzie (gmcken@direct.ca) wrote:

: Hey Michelle. Just letting you know your doing a fine job. Anytime Ms.
: Amero has to go searching the net for unrelated posts, we know she's
: gone beyond reason (course she usually starts there anyway).

Hey, Gordon. What's with so many of you fellas using "your" when 
you mean *you are*?? Then these same fellas, like Buzz, criticize 
my readin' and writin'.

If you're referring to Michelle's comments about me dragging out her old
posts, the comments I referred to were from her fairly recent posts in the
"Rape Proclivity Among Males" thread and were related to the discussion at
hand. And at the time she made her comment, I think that I had just
commented on what I remembered her saying in one of her posts. She also
commented IRT me that the mind is the first thing to go. I wasn't aware
that the mind is the first thing to go and don't know what she means.
Wonder where it goes? And what does she mean? Wonder if it was a comment
IRT my age? Such discriminatory remarks are often made about and to older
and old people. And such is even used to ridicule those who are not older
or old people. Surely she would not make an ageist comment.

I do not start out reading posters old posts. Given the number of recent
posts I read and reply to, I wouldn't have the time to search the 'net
for posters old posts. I hit on threads and read the recent posts. 
I often read the recent posts in DejaNews because my news server does not
pick up all the posts. That is what I was doing when I hit on one of your
posts and then hit on your Author Profile. I noticed the newsgroup
alt.tasteless.jokes and checked to see what a fella who was telling women
to go to "nice decent normal men" like him for help was having to say in
alt.tasteless.jokes. What you had to say was indeed tasteless. You were 
in there demeaning and degrading women - including a dead nun, soon to be
Saint -  along with other men who were doing the same. And don't retort
that you kept such in the appropriate newsgroup. I'd rather you be upfront 
in here IRT demeaning and degrading women.

I want to note that it was the fellas who informed me about DejaNews.
I didn't know it existed. The fellas started reposting my old posts
from DejaNews and I asked a friend to show me how to get to DejaNews.

And the fellas are right some foolish to say that I delete old posts
to destroy evidence, evidence of what I don't know. If I delete old
posts, then how are they able to repost my old posts? The fellas in
here are kinda dull.

Now, thanks to the fellas, when I want to know more about the posters
whose posts I'm making follow-up posts to, I hit on their Author Profile
to see what they're saying elsewhere. 
The fellas in here lie like cheap rugs. 

Frank Poole aka Buzz was off in other newsgroups making racist comments.
In the "Single Mothers" thread, he claimed some higher moral ground, while
off posting in what some would consider unsavoury newsgroups, posting
in threads such as "Natural tits and bush hair". Another married man,
Ken Chaddock, was posting his opposition, in ns.general, to "no-fault
divorce", wanting such abolished and posting about living up to marital
obligations, etc. was off in alt.polyamory telling folks there about his
many sexual partners. What they were posting in those threads was relevant
to the discussion at hand in ns.general. And you demeaning and degrading
women in other newsgroups while telling women in these newsgroups to go to
nice, decent, normal men like you for help was relevant to the discussion
at hand.

If you don't agree, I couldn't care less.

I, also, want to note that I've not seen you comment on men searching 
the net (and obviously spending much time doing so) and posting my
unrelated old posts. If you haven't, then your double-standard has 
reared its ugly head again. 

You lost your credibility with your posts in alt.tasteless.jokes.
You expressed your indignation IRT me attacking you for your unwanted,
unsolicited, patronizing email and said you were not going to read
anymore of my posts. Didn't you say that you killfiled me at work?? 
If so, why would you need to do that? You shouldn't be playing on the 
'net when you're at work. Yet you keep reading and replying to my posts.
When I confronted you about that, you said you just say those things
to annoy me. Really Gordon I couldn't care less if you say you've
killfiled me or killfile me. I just like to point out how many men
say they don't read my posts and keep reading and replying to them. ;-)