🚀 go-pugleaf

michelle@doherty-enterprises.mb.ca wrote:
On 17 Dec 1997 18:02:00 GMT, ak955@chebucto.ns.ca (Barbara Amero)wrote:

[snip]

>I'm not aware that Nova Scotia can wish anything.

: Do you walk on Nova Scotia soil? 

Now that's a silly question. The "Amero Gang" has posted over and over
that Barbara Amero never gets her ass off her chair in front of her
computer.

: And your boots are full of what?

I don't wear boots.

: stuff said.

what stuff was said?

A question for you. Have you considered that I might be in a wheel-chair
and not walking on Nova Scotia soil in boots? I've noticed in here that
posters automatically assume that everyone walks about on two legs --
and now with boots on the end of them.

Again Michelle, Nova Scotia can't wish anything.

>BTW I wasn't living in Nova Scotia when my ex-husband was offered the
>position in Manitoba. Michelle, we don't all get married after we finish
>school to a fella who buys us a house on the same street we grew up on and
>stay put with a male "protector", living a sheltered life, not having any
>bad experiences with men on the city streets, reaching middle-age with
>a very limited view of the world.

: I do not stay put with a male protector. I happily share my life with
: a partner that respects me. Does that bother you? The fact that he is
: capable of protection, is a moot point.

OK, you stay put and happily share your life with a partner who respects
you, and living, as you put it, a "sheltered (protected)" life.

No, it doesn't bother me that you happily share your life with a partner
who respects you. It's the male protector, sheltered (protected) life 
bit that bothers me ... and IRT protection, I'm not just referring to
brute strength. And this is the second time in this thread that you've
said the male protector stuff is a moot point. Do you mean the fact
that he is capable of protection is open to question, debatable or not
of practical significance? Whatever, you brought it up in another thread
so such seems to be of practical significance to you.
                                                    
:>You're avoiding the issue Michelle. You've got a dead newsgroup in
:>which you want to discuss the weather. I wouldn't be surprised if
:>the next topic choice is how to get lipstick off your carpet.

: sigh. As stated before, when I want gutter talk I know where to come.

But why do you want it? You should demonstrate your strength, "flex" your
political muscles in this public forum to save womankind from Barbara
Amero (as I understand you want to), not waste your public voice on this
diddleshit attack.

:> Jean is wading her way thru "private drival" to get to nothing.

: Jean is quite capable of looking after herself.

Then she shouldn't need you to speak for her. And I sure as hell don't
want to look after her. I'm just wondering why a woman would be wading
her way thru "private drival" to get to nothing. 

>And the fellas say I'm a fruitcake.

: well said.

Thanks... next to you two women, some of the fellas might not view me as
such a fruitcake. FYI in case you don't know all the rules of the fellas
game in here (and you seem to wanna play the fellas game), a rule is to
use one woman to put another woman down. Abbie was used by the fellas in
ns.general to put me down. Then when she turned on one of the fellas, the
fella used me to put her down. She was just a wannabe lunachick and not a
real lunachick like me. Ain't never seen nuthin' like it. So if you don't
want to be demoted, don't get unruly and uppity with the fellas. You'll be
just a wannabe gutter talker. You might even have a sexually explicit
fictitious story posted about you. Gawd, I just had a horrid thought....
the fellas might post that I've been getting into your panties.