🚀 go-pugleaf

On 18 Dec 1997 10:38:28 GMT, ak955@chebucto.ns.ca (Barbara Amero)
created the following:

>Jay-north* [Dennis] (Jay-North*@Direct.ca) wrote:
>
>[snip your persistent ridiculous allegations]
>
>: I have a couple of questions for you though.  When did you pose for
>: the item in question?  Are you proud of the results?  You appear to be
>: because you consistently make reference to it.  
>
>The above which you also sent to me and CCN via email is offensive. 
>You are a sick puppy.
>
Why not post the entire post instead of just the parts you want to
attack?

>[snip more of your garbage]
>
>: On 17 Dec 1997 04:50:54 GMT, fomin@shell.thecia.ne (Barbara Amero)
>: created the following:
>
>The above was perhaps created by you?
>
Do you really think I would do such a thing?   Unlike you I am not in
the habit of claiming things to be true when they are not.

>"fomin@shell.thecis.ne" is NOT Barbara Amero
>
>: Why did you feel it necessary to post more profanity to get your point
>: across?
>
>>Since Jay-north is concerned about what people and young people
>>in particular are being exposed to in these general newsgroups,
>>I have censored the above picture for sensitive viewers. And
>>I trust that Jay-north will be making a complaint to and about
>>Dr. Vladimir Il'ich Fomin <fomin@shell.thecia.net>. Therefore,
>>I will not bother to make a complaint to and about him. I assume
>>the Dr. is a him, since generally it is only men who use the
>>word "XXXXXX" and "faggots" in these general newsgroups.
>
>Why did you feel it necessary to censor the word "cunt" and not "faggots"?
>I'd say that is a rather telling gesture on your part.
>
How nice of you to provide an analysis of me.  Ir is also interesting
that you repeatetedly claim that it is only men who use such words
when in fact you are the only one who has used them.

>I find the latter word to be offensive. I do not find the former to be
>offensive; I find the way in which the men in here use the word to be
>offensive.
>
>I find you offensive and fraudulent.
>
How interesting that you find me offensive and fraudulent whe all I
have done is ask you not to post such extreme profanity in general
newsgroups that are read by children.

>You publicly and privately attack me with false allegations while
>ignoring *men* who daily post lanugage that you consider to be 
>profantity and offensive.
>
Since when is a request that you not post extreme profanity attacking
you?  Publicly and privately?  I sent you a copy of the complaint I
made to your ISP about your profanity and I will contiunue to do so.

>You have now sent more ridiculous allegations to CCN and me.
>Last night I found 6 emails from you in my mailbox, most with the
>same message. Not only are you offensive and fraudulent, you are
>also a 'net harasser.
>
Allegations?  How do you figure quotes of your posting are
allegations?

Thank you for the title of net harasser.  I noticed later that I sent
the same message to you 6 times.   Sorry about that.  But, it seems to
me you did exactly the same thing with one of your posts recently.

>IRT your harassment of me, "This is getting REAL OLD!". Give it a rest!

Why do you feel a request that you do not continue to post extreme
profanity is harassment?