🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:04:36 -0600, Finch <canadian@NOicenterspam.net>
wrote to All:

>If you want to comment on someone's comments in another newsgroup then
>you should have the guts to go into that newsgroup and comment directly
>to them.
>
That's strange, Jean.....She usually spams half of usenet with her
stuff. Perhaps she's been told to get off Michelle's case?

>You continue to prove my point by constantly bringing up the same old
>shit.  Come on BA, can't you do better than that????

You over-estimate her, greatly!

Someone Anonymous wrote:
>> Anyone who makes public posts should expect those
>> posts to be discussed and/or attacked. 

(She means: All except that Anonymous person, who's above all that.)

>Read above, BA.

No, Jean....She doesn't read. She just assumes what you must have
written, and responds with the same thing....over, and over, and over,
ad nauseam. Like the following, which I've seen her post 1,753 times,
in the past month!

>> Even with the maybe, that is an attack on me, my ex-husband of 22 1/2
>> years and the father of my 3 adult children, as well as other men in my
>> life. I know there are good men out there; some of them have been/are
>> in my life. However, 

(Rule 483: Always insert a "however" after any statement containing
the words, "good men."  And if you haven't been accused before of
attacking the people she lists above, you must be a new arrival.)

>>after reading posts by "beergut", IMO Michelle
>> should evaluate her taste, or lack of it, in men.

Can't help wondering why HER ex-husband didn't re-evaluate HIS taste
sometime during those "22�" years? Only a dedicated masochist would
have kept her around longer than a week?

>Again, you go into boring detail about your 22 years.  (snore)
>BA, how heavily are you medicated?
  
Nowhere near heavily enough, apparently. She still becomes
semi-conscious occasionally. That's when you'd see those posts
attributed to ak955@ccn.cs.dal.ca.  This understandably upset
Dalhousie University so much, that they made CCN take the 'dal' out of
their address. So now those periods of less than semi-lucidity are
marked by streams of pasted reiterations concerning the 22 years etc.,
authored by ak955@chebucto.ns.ca,  self-proclaimed owner of the
Chebucto Community Freenet.

>If you were to gather all your posts
>and read them at once you would find that you repeat yourself over and
>over again - as if this will convince anyone that you are in any way
>correct.  

Actually, the first few of them that you read should convince you that
her interpretation of anything is invariably screwed up. From then on
they're merely boring repetitions. Which is the second reason why
no-one will ever read all of her posts.

>In logical argument the key is to raise a point (or points)
>which support your position and if that doesn't work then raise another
>point to your benefit.  You just go on and on and on using the same
>points.  And if someone disagrees with you you then claim that you are
>being abused/assaulted/stalked/attacked/etc/etc/ect.  Come on BA.  And
>when posters then disagree with that you then try and discredit the
>validity of their position by combing other newsgroups for stuff.  This
>is rational discussion?  Puleeeez!

Ahh! You have her number! But you've used the magic word. "Logic" is
unfamiliar to the person to whom you are responding. It was in the
part of her Womens' Studies classes that she missed, due to flunking
out. Therefore for you to use logic on her is unfair!  Be ready for
her to claim that you are using your professional standing to unfair
advantage. I hope that you've never signed anything with a signature
which includes any indication of your academic accomplishments? 

Here's a illogical quote from ak955, in which she uses that word with
which she's unfamiliar:
>> I've seen nothing posted by you that would suggest you are a
>>qualified judge of logical argument. 


>Jean
>(p.s I have tried to spare the ngs not directly connected to the poster
>and myself)

That's nice of you, Jean...But ak955 will just add them back in when
she responds....and she will! The world is waiting... : )

Try addressing your comments to others on the group(s).  Leaving ak955
out of the exchanges should result in a major hissy fit, which might
cause her meds to be adjusted upward to the point where she'll
disappear.

Happy New Year, John

John Jenkins Sr.      -     daddio@thezone.net