🚀 go-pugleaf

On 24 Dec 1997 07:52:47 GMT, ak955@chebucto.ns.ca (Barbara Amero)
wrote:


>OTOH Frank Poole aka Buzz knows how to prevent others from cancelling
>their own posts. Frank Poole aka Buzz wrote that he put a "little lock"
>on my posts so that I can't cancel them. Is he allowed to do that?
>Couldn't he get into trouble for doing that? I think Buzz could get
>into trouble for doing that.

So don't just sit there, do something!! Your mouth is always in gear
but your brain is steadfastly in neutral. If you don't know what a
"lock" is I suggest you enlighten yourself. Afterall, I thought you
were the great "know everything" person. You are very sad you know. 
Talk to your lawyer about it. BTW, I'm still waiting for his/her name,
you could save yourself being served.

>On Sat, 17 May 1997 21:13:12 GMT, fpoole@auracom.com wrote:
>
>> I sort of promised myself that I wouldn't get involved with the
>> notorious babble of the Queen of Babble again, but I must add this.
>> BooBoo reports everyone that doesn't agree with her. She reported me
>> to Hook-up which could be her fatal mistake as a usenet participant.
>
>Hmm... "fatal"

Yep. To bad you have difficulty reading and comprehending the total
text.

>> You see, I have put a little (or is it liddle) lock on BA posts, so
>> that she can't erase them (dating back to "Single Mothers"). 

Apparently you are "locking" my posts as well. So right back to
you....."is that legal"?

>George
>> you are right about the ISP's are now looking at this whole thing with
>> BA. She can snivel and whine all she wants now, as she can't undo the
>> posts that I have saved for the ISP investigation. There IS a
>> difference between a good paying customer and a mealey mouthed
>> free-loader.

So why did you repeat this? Does the truth hurt? I was wrong in the
above situation, so I am glad you reprinted it. I should have said a
"dirty  mouthed free-loader". Do you like that better? It's also the
substantiated truth. Your posts support it all.  If CCN ever has
enough guts to monitor your posts they will see your a risk to their
existance and give you the cyber boot.

>So how did the investigation go? Perhaps you weren't paying good enough.

Like I said, CCN has no leadership or monitors. Hence the whole
organization may be inviolation of the Acceptable Use Polices (AUP's)
that were outlined by the feds, whose grants set them up. I don't
think that you will be very popular if the NRC shuts Chebucto down.
Only problem is court action against you must also include your ISP.
It all takes time, but time we have.

>I hear that ISP had some financial difficulties and customers were having
>mega problems. Guess that ISP was too preoccupied with other things to do
>the investigation. 

No one is about to support an ISP that is dominated by an ignormus now
are they?

>Well, Buzzard you do all the 'vestigatin' you want, just make sure you
>leave my posts alone.

You know what dogs do to posts? Well Merry Christmas Barbara!


>Barbara A. Amero

Buzz aka Frank