🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <scs.715190637@hela.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
>chad@quality.ta.ford.com (Chad Childers) writes:
>
>>>Which Fido echoes would be appropriate for a gateway?
>
> . . . some discussion ensued . . .
>
>>Dang!  Exactly what we want!  I suggest we gate Tom's group as mi.fido.jobs
>>and forget about a separate mi.jobs.  If anyone wants to post jobs and not
>>let local fido users read them, they can put them in mi.misc.
>
>Over time the distinctions between the various transport networks
>breaks down more and more.  I would much rather see any gatewayed
>groups avoid putting `fido' as part of the name.  If there is a
>reasonable amount of traffic in the fido group and if those jobs
>are primarily of interest to computing types, a mi.jobs <-> fido
>job list gateway would be most appropriate.
>
>In the more general case, if there are other Michigan-oriented fido
>things which someone thinks should be gatewayed, let's hear about
>them.  Meg?
>-- 
>Steve: #1 of human beings on the Zwicky list