Article View: mi.misc
Article #283Re: MI.ORG
From: Bryan Beecher
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:29
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:29
50 lines
3062 bytes
3062 bytes
Edward Vielmetti writes: > >For my own part I would rather see the University of Michigan spend >its attention on other public works projects and get out of the >free UUCP feeds business, especially in the parts of the state >where there are commercial providers and other free providers ready >to go at the task. Now that ITD has a big bill to pay back to the >US Gov't for overcharging for MTS, it hardly makes any sense to me >why they are giving away a service that's either a valuable service >(in which case they should charge for it) or a worthless service >(in which case they should stop doing it). Well, U-M is a big place, and IMHO it has enough attention for many, many projects simultaneously. In all honesty the marginal costs for what we do in the UUCP biz is very low. This is due to a couple of factors: o We have eliminated about 80% of the UUCP-based news feeds we were giving out. This means that the machine used for this service does a lot less compressing and batching. o We don't poll anyone. So we don't have any phone bills to pay. o We don't really provide any kind of "customer support." If you don't know what you're doing, and your stuff backs up on our machine, we'll cut you off. We can't spend time handling this kind of stuff. The costs then are the marginal cost of doing some UUCP-based news and allowing other sites to dial-in to get a tiny amount of mail. Staff time is only involved when setting up an account or eliminating one, and either one of these involves very little time. Since Wes does most of this, he's the one to give the authoritative word. To my mind we provide a different service than a place like MSEN. You want reliability, go to MSEN. You want customer support, go to MSEN. You want prompt action, go to MSEN. We are no-frills, but I think the service we do provide is decent enough that it is still valuable. We have gone around and around in circles on charging for this service. The current thinking seems to be that the costs involved in the accounting and billing would outweigh the costs in providing the service, and so it isn't practicable. This is just my take on the issue; the view from the trenches, and should not be taken as having come from anyone who actually gets to make decisions or set policy or anything like that. -- Bryan Beecher, U-M Information Technology Division (+1 313 747 4050) Domain: Bryan.Beecher@umich.edu Path: ..!uunet!destroyer!bryan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k3lcbINN76q@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!notorious.rs.itd.umich.edu!bryanReferences:
<1jpiliINNm17@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> <1jvtslINN6i9@nigel.msen.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!notorious.rs.itd.umich.edu!bryan From: bryan@notorious.rs.itd.umich.edu (Bryan Beecher) Newsgroups: mi.misc,mi.news Subject: Re: MI.ORG Date: 26 Jan 1993 15:29:15 GMT Organization: U of Michigan ITD Research Systems Lines: 50 Message-ID: <1k3lcbINN76q@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> References: <1jpiliINNm17@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> <1jvtslINN6i9@nigel.msen.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: notorious.rs.itd.umich.edu