🚀 go-pugleaf

> Balance, anyone? You have some nerve writing about leaders of the free
> world. I guess Clinton has been a beacon to follow, right?

Not exactly a beacon, but he was respected by most other heads of state.
We'll see about Georgie.

> You filthy hypocrite. All the shit Clinton and Gore weaseled out of and
> you are going to lambaste Bush because of his speech.

Yes.  A president-elect who hasn't got a high-school level grasp of the
language, who is a multiple failure at business, a half-wit with a trust
fund, is ripe for lambasting.  So is one who got a blow job or two at the
White House, then lied about it because of the hell to pay in the form of
his wife.  You wanna start running your mouth about stuff people weaseled
out of?  How about Reagan and Papa Bush weaseling out of Iran Contra?  Gimme
a freaking break.  You're already calling names.  You must be out of
arguments.  Better listen to Rush again for more nonsense to throw around.

> At least bad
> speech isn't illegal. It *is* possible to be a decent man with bad
> grammar, just as it is possible to be a filthy piece of shit while
> being photogenic and having a mastery of the English language.

True, bad speech isn't illegal, but it is a bit embarassing, don't you
think?  You heard about it when your boy Quayle was in office, and you're
going to hear it more with Gubna Dubya.  I suspect he is a decent man
though.

> You are a product of the new age, and I loathe you. You put more value
> on form than function.

Wrong, who cares, and wrong.  We'll see how much function happens in Dubya's
administration.