Article View: mi.misc
Article #561Re: Suppression of military votes in Florida
From: J.D. Baldwin
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:58
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:58
49 lines
3385 bytes
3385 bytes
In the previous article, <fsalsbur@mindspring.com> wrote: > Every piece of mail from ships goes through FPO's which are more > than capable of applying a postmark. Capable, yes. But sometimes they blow it off. If a shipment of as- yet-unpostmarked mail is sitting there, and a plane is about to leave, they'll load it up without bothering to postmark it. I think that theoretically it's supposed to get postmarked by the receiving office stateside, but in practice this sometimes doesn't happen. Out of the hundreds of pieces of mail I've sent to the US from ships abroad, and out of the maybe two dozen such I've received, I'd say at least 15% were unpostmarked. (I used to pay close attention to stuff like that.) > If you want to blame someone for military votes blame the FPO's who > did not apply postmarks. I don't "blame" anyone, personally. If the law says they were invalid without postmarks, then they were invalid without postmarks. Fine, throw 'em out. Of course, "the law" also says that votes need to be certified by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, November 14th. And that the Florida Secretary of State may ignore tallies submitted after the deadline. And that county officials who fail to meet the deadline must -- *must* -- be fined. When do we start respecting that law? I don't have a problem with the Democrats throwing out these votes. I have a problem with them throwing out these votes and then turning around and mouthing lies about how they want "every vote counted." > Also eventhough I could mail my vote postage free I always put a > stamp on it they will postmark that. That makes you a very unusual individual. I don't know too many people who stamp postage-free mail. > Also several of the ballots were not signed and/or witnessed both > are throw out qualifications. Yes, those are most certainly grounds for throwing out ballots. And rightly so. -- _+_ From the catapult of |If anyone disagrees with any statement I make, I _|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also \ / baldwin@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it. -T. Lehrer ***~~~~-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8vnnv3$d6a$2@news.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!howland.erols.net!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A1EE18E.2C14693F@mindspring.com> <3a1f4328.13927254@nntp.mindspring.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115597,bdb0f825613bcaea X-Google-Attributes: gid115597,public X-Google-Thread: 10d662,bdb0f825613bcaea X-Google-Attributes: gid10d662,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-24 22:58:44 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!howland.erols.net!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: INVALID_SEE_SIG@example.com (J.D. Baldwin) Newsgroups: mi.misc,fl.politics Subject: Re: Suppression of military votes in Florida Date: 25 Nov 2000 06:58:43 GMT Organization: Revealed on a need-to-know basis. Lines: 49 Message-ID: <8vnnv3$d6a$2@news.panix.com> References: <3A1EE18E.2C14693F@mindspring.com> <3a1f4328.13927254@nntp.mindspring.com> Reply-To: baldwin+news@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix6.panix.com X-Trace: news.panix.com 975135523 13514 166.84.0.231 (25 Nov 2000 06:58:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Nov 2000 06:58:43 GMT X-PGP-Key-Info: Key number 869CC8A5, finger <my_last_name>@panix.com for full key X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test74 (May 26, 2000) Originator: baldwin@panix.com (J.D. Baldwin)