🚀 go-pugleaf

John Karras wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:43:58 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> John Karras wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:16:32 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Karras wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:19:43 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking at *this* picture, can you advise when the format changed so
>>>>>> that no photograph is now included?
>>>>>> http://i41.tinypic.com/1z14etx.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's just an example. I'm referring to Linkedin in general terms.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it is not "just an example." It is a continuation of your slimy
>>>>> and hinky attempt to damage the reputation of the person whose
>>>>> account you have pictured. The fact that you had *retained a
>>>>> screenshot* of the earlier version of *his* profile proves this.
>>>>> You've been stalking him for a long time, posting both his LinkedIn
>>>>> and Aumha pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any rebuttal from you to the contrary will be another lie.
>>>>
>>>> Sycho is a bit brighter than you, John.
>>>>
>>>> He spotted that the picture on the left hand side is a fraud.
>>>
>>> Where is this alleged comment by Sycho?
>>
>> I never do 'alleged' - it is *always* the truth!
>
> You rarely tell the full truth. You speak in slime.
>
>> Here:-
>>
>>    http://3wd.no-ip.org/exposed/BD/1z14etx.jpg
>
> That's a copy of the picture you posted. With a LOL.

*Exactly*!

Sycho was emphasising that *my* Linkedin page was being used at that 
time, not Randy's. Doh!

>>> It is the identical picture Randy had on his former Aumha VSOP page.
>>> http://web.archive.org/web/20061010022701/http://aumha.org/vsop.php
>>
>> It is.
>>
>> Who removed it from there - and why?
>
> Perhaps if you hadn't alienated yourself from Aumha and Randy in
> particular, they/he might even have told you why. What it looks like is
> Randy retired from being a Aumha VSOP. Others have come and gone as well.
> But your slimy, hinky, paranoiac mind sees that as something nefarious.

I never had *any* contact with him there.

>>> You also rebutted "to the contrary" thus assuring everyone that you
>>> have been stalking Randy, posting links with slimy comments about his
>>> web pages for a long time.
>>
>> He is NOT straight and true.
>
> More Slime. You have no evidence, just your own lies and innuendo.
>
>>>> Why would Graham have done that, do you think?
>>>
>>> What in hell would Graham have to do with Randy Knobloch's LinkedIn
>>> page? You can't weasel out of this; you're a stalker.
>>
>> Graham 'produced it' as evidence! I posted the thread.
>
> Why would Graham want to do dirty work for you?  I've removed pictures of
> myself from the web as well so you can't find them.

It's a shame this has all gone over your head. Oh, well. <shrug>

You are entitled to your own views.

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."