🚀 go-pugleaf

Peter Foldes wrote:
> Just shows you Dave that I can go back to your posts even to 2006 to
> show how you are fibbing today in your posts. Unfortunately your
> memories are non existent and it is part of your downfall . Not the
> whole part but a part of it


For anyone reading here who doesn't know the history of my 
'relationship' with Peter Foldes, please pop in to the newsgroup 
'microsoft.public.test.here' or to www.pqlr.org/bbs where a better 
picture may be gleaned.

Mr Foldes has today reproduced, accurately, copies of my posts I made 
three years ago (may be seen in the MS test group)

I am well aware that Google knows everything but why - do YOU think - 
would a run-of-the-mill newsgroup poster have copies of messages which I 
made years ago. I *must* be *really* special, eh?!!

On the other hand, he may have copies of all of *your* personal posts 
too. Is that likely, do you think? Would you care?

**

So ..... in reply to Peter:

My memory is fine, Peter, and I've been truthful always. I was most 
interested, indeed delighted, to discover that you have accurate copies 
of posts I made back in 2006. It does not surprise me at all.

Now - please tell me, and others reading here, exactly *WHY* you have 
such records.

I'm quite certain that the Police, Security Services, FBI and any other 
Government Agencies would be hung, drawn and quartered for abusing my 
'Human Rights' if they were to hold such information.

Your explanation is eagerly awaited!  :)

--
Dave