🚀 go-pugleaf

Aardvark wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>
>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
>>> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
>>> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>
>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers.  The old ways
>> should be restored.  Where will we start?
>>
>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>> church?
>> Gays?  Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>
>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>
> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God. I
> would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of shit
> deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians as is
> the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>
> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.


I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to 
the mother of his children.

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:45:46 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including
>>>> denying His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by
>>>> the temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and
>>>> fine.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>>
>>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers.  The old ways
>>> should be restored.  Where will we start?
>>>
>>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>>> church?
>>> Gays?  Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>>
>>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>>
>> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God.
>> I would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
>> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of shit
>> deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians as is
>> the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>>
>> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
>> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.
> 
> 
> <SNIP IRRELEVANT SHIT>

Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
Christian by any definition that I understand the word.



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On 31/03/12 21:45, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
>>>> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
>>>> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>>
>>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers. The old ways
>>> should be restored. Where will we start?
>>>
>>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>>> church?
>>> Gays? Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>>
>>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>>
>> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God. I
>> would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
>> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of shit
>> deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians as is
>> the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>>
>> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
>> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.
>
>
> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to
> the mother of his children.
>

What does that have to do with things Dave?

-- 
Cheers
Oldus Fartus

Oldus Fartus wrote:
> On 31/03/12 21:45, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
>>>>> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
>>>>> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and
>>>>> fine.
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>>>
>>>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers. The old ways
>>>> should be restored. Where will we start?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>>>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>>>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>>>> church?
>>>> Gays? Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God. I
>>> would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
>>> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of shit
>>> deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians as is
>>> the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>>>
>>> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
>>> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.
>>
>>
>> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to
>> the mother of his children.
>>
>
> What does that have to do with things Dave?

I don't have a picture in my mind of you being a low-life, although you 
may be. Hard to tell for sure. I seem to vaguely remember you saying 
something about standards and injustice. <shrug>

Whilst here, were you/are you married the the mother of your children?

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:59:40 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:

> On 31/03/12 21:45, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including
>>>>> denying His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by
>>>>> the temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment
>>>>> and fine.
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>>>
>>>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers. The old ways
>>>> should be restored. Where will we start?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>>>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>>>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>>>> church?
>>>> Gays? Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>>>
>>> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God.
>>> I would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
>>> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of
>>> shit deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians
>>> as is the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>>>
>>> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
>>> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.
>>
>>
>> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to
>> the mother of his children.
>>
>>
> What does that have to do with things Dave?

Absolutely nothing, as far as I can ascertain, mate. The legitimacy or 
otherwise of my offspring in a civil sense has absolutely nothing to do 
with my moral obligation towards others.

Big fucking deal. So someone's parents aren't married. Doesn't make them 
lesser people in any way, does it, mate?

I've never assaulted any of them, either verbally or physically. I wonder 
if that cunt can say the same about his own brood.

-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On 31/03/12 22:09, ~BD~ wrote:
>> What does that have to do with things Dave?
>
> I don't have a picture in my mind of you being a low-life, although you
> may be. Hard to tell for sure. I seem to vaguely remember you saying
> something about standards and injustice. <shrug>
>
> Whilst here, were you/are you married the the mother of your children?

Use your skills and do a Google search Dave - I've used the same nym 
since about 98 or so.

-- 
Cheers
Oldus Fartus

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:31:31 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:

> On 31/03/12 22:09, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> What does that have to do with things Dave?
>>
>> I don't have a picture in my mind of you being a low-life, although you
>> may be. Hard to tell for sure. I seem to vaguely remember you saying
>> something about standards and injustice. <shrug>
>>
>> Whilst here, were you/are you married the the mother of your children?
> 
> Use your skills and do a Google search Dave - I've used the same nym
> since about 98 or so.

I wonder why he's all of a sudden so interested in the marital status of 
others. Fucking baffling, mate.



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On 31/03/12 22:22, Aardvark wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:59:40 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>


>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to
>>> the mother of his children.
>>>
>>>
>> What does that have to do with things Dave?
>
> Absolutely nothing, as far as I can ascertain, mate. The legitimacy or
> otherwise of my offspring in a civil sense has absolutely nothing to do
> with my moral obligation towards others.
>

If anyone else asked me, during a genuine discussion, I would be happy 
to answer.

> Big fucking deal. So someone's parents aren't married. Doesn't make them
> lesser people in any way, does it, mate?
>

Definitely not.  BD's attitude was, I thought, discarded half a century ago.

> I've never assaulted any of them, either verbally or physically. I wonder
> if that cunt can say the same about his own brood.
>

Going by Dave's posts, he probably gave his offspring a good thrashing 
once a week, whether they needed it or not.

-- 
Cheers
Oldus Fartus

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:41:53 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:

> On 31/03/12 22:22, Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:59:40 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>
>>
> 
> 
>>>>
>>>> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married
>>>> to the mother of his children.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What does that have to do with things Dave?
>>
>> Absolutely nothing, as far as I can ascertain, mate. The legitimacy or
>> otherwise of my offspring in a civil sense has absolutely nothing to do
>> with my moral obligation towards others.
>>
>>
> If anyone else asked me, during a genuine discussion, I would be happy
> to answer.
> 

Me too. It doesn't bother me, or them, nor does it make one iota of 
difference to their lives in any way that I can conceive that myself and 
their mother never jumped the broomstick.

I was married once, that was enough (you and I know what Oscar had to say 
about marrying for a second time, don't we?), and SWMBO never fancied it. 
I did ask her once or twice in the early days (in a half-hearted, joking 
manner) but she just gave me an old-fashioned look, as if I was nucking 
futs.

We know quite a number of couples of our generation who married at about 
the same time as we got together. I don't think any of them are still 
together. One or two didn't even last a fucking year.

All those poor kids, the detritus of broken homes.

We've had our ups and downs, mate. Even split up for six months once 
(that was tough on me, not being able to see the kids every day). Missed 
my oldest lad's first steps ('he learned to walk while I was away').

We're still here, we're still together for the kids and for each other.

What else matters, eh?  

>> Big fucking deal. So someone's parents aren't married. Doesn't make
>> them lesser people in any way, does it, mate?
>>
>>
> Definitely not.  BD's attitude was, I thought, discarded half a century
> ago.
> 

Maybe he thinks Victoria is still on the throne. Maybe someone should 
tell him it's Lizzie Mark II.

>> I've never assaulted any of them, either verbally or physically. I
>> wonder if that cunt can say the same about his own brood.
>>
>>
> Going by Dave's posts, he probably gave his offspring a good thrashing
> once a week, whether they needed it or not.

Indeed. Spare the rod, spoil the child would probably be his child-
rearing motto.



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On 3/31/2012 1:34 AM, Oldus Fartus wrote:
> On 31/03/12 04:50, Jenn wrote: nothing
>
> Thread marked read
>

Did everyone know that OF is the leader of a hate group?  Go take a look 
at alt.fan.jennicam and read from start to present.  He'll pick out one 
person and just go to town, so if you think you know who he is now, 
remember you could be next on his list.

-- 
Jenn

On 3/31/2012 5:47 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>> My fault entirely, Buffalo. No fault lies with you.
>>
>> I may be right or I may be wrong, but I considered my original two or
>> three multi-crossposts to be apt, for a number of reasons.
>>
>>> Damn. I will have to remind myself to check where it is going before I
>>> send the reply.
>>> Sorry.
>>> Buffalo
>
>
> Yep. He's *a real gentleman* is Aardvark with a powerful command of the
> English language, viz-a-viz
>
> Aardvark said:-
>
> Message-ID: <jl5bkq$mcu$2@dont-email.me>
> User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea;
> GIT 30dc37b master)
> X-Abuse: If you wish to be told to fuck off and quit being a fucking
> pussy, send an email to abuse@aardvark.uk.tc
>
> Is your sack of shit 'God' going to forgive you, you fucking sack of shit?
>
> --
>
> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom

Aardvark believes his own press, and betrays his friends.


-- 
Jenn

On 3/31/2012 7:07 AM, Oldus Fartus wrote:
> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
>> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
>> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>
> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers. The old ways
> should be restored. Where will we start?
>
> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including church?
> Gays? Participants in pre-marital sex?
>
> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>

Perhaps we all should follow your example and open hate groups so we can 
gather like-minded people amongst us who hate the target person?

In this case .. RonNNN, and Betty are your students of hate.

-- 
Jenn

On 31/03/12 22:33, Aardvark wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:31:31 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>
>> On 31/03/12 22:09, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> What does that have to do with things Dave?
>>>
>>> I don't have a picture in my mind of you being a low-life, although you
>>> may be. Hard to tell for sure. I seem to vaguely remember you saying
>>> something about standards and injustice.<shrug>
>>>
>>> Whilst here, were you/are you married the the mother of your children?
>>
>> Use your skills and do a Google search Dave - I've used the same nym
>> since about 98 or so.
>
> I wonder why he's all of a sudden so interested in the marital status of
> others. Fucking baffling, mate.
>
>

What was it he used to say-
"Enquiring minds wish to know ..."

-- 
Cheers
Oldus Fartus

On 3/31/2012 8:45 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:07:18 +0800, Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/03/12 18:47, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> May God forgive him for his blasphemies against God, including denying
>>>> His being or providence. Such a thing was once punishable by the
>>>> temporal courts with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom
>>>
>>> I agree Dave, it is obvious you have all the answers. The old ways
>>> should be restored. Where will we start?
>>>
>>> Perhaps we could stone some adulterers?
>>> Or could force women to submit to their husband's will?
>>> How about excluding menstruating woman from gatherings, including
>>> church?
>>> Gays? Participants in pre-marital sex?
>>>
>>> I'm sure we can come up with more.
>>
>> Funny thing is, mate, I never said a word against *the* Christian God. I
>> would never dream of doing so, for that would be wrong. Any negative
>> comments I made were directed at that cunt's travesty of a sack of shit
>> deity, as far removed from the God worshipped by true Christians as is
>> the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
>>
>> Whatever set of 'values' that cunt lives by, they certainly aren't
>> Christian by any definition that I understand the word.
>
>
> I don't know for sure, but I'd wager that OldusFartus was/is married to
> the mother of his children.
>

Let's hope he didn't train up any offspring to be haters like he is.

-- 
Jenn

RonNNN explained :
>
> "Jenn" <no@em.ail> wrote in message news:jl796u$f91$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 3/31/2012 10:39 AM, Aardvark wrote:
>> 
>>> Heh. Enquiring minds have my permission to go and get fucked with a
>>> broken bottle, mate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> You're full of hate, too.  Wanting people to hurt themselves with broken 
>> bottles??
>
> Says Jenn, "Attention Monger 1st Class" and " Foot Stomp'n Cry Baby"!

-- 
Eagle
I've been over there fighting with Jenn, but it's a losing battle. She 
is one sharp harridan!!--Betty

~BD~ laid this down on his screen :
> Aardvark *has* no friends.
>
> His daughter told me that face-to-face.

Did she really Dave? :/

-- 
Eagle
Did your sack of shit 'God' forgive you --aardvark

Eagle wrote:
> ~BD~ laid this down on his screen :
>> Aardvark *has* no friends.
>>
>> His daughter told me that face-to-face.
>
> Did she really Dave? :/

She did, indeed! I've no idea why he denies that she did so. <shrug>

Have a good day, Dave Eagle! :-)

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

Eagle wrote:
> ~BD~ laid this down on his screen :
>> Aardvark *has* no friends.
>>
>> His daughter told me that face-to-face.
>
> Did she really Dave? :/
>

Maybe you can ask Aardvark what *he* thinks his daughter said to me.

He seems to dispute what I've said. <shrug>

Message-ID: <jl9egb$orj$1@dont-email.me>

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

Bear wrote:
> "Jenn" <me@noe.mail.com> wrote in news:jl5bbd$5a4$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:39:33 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:17:23 -0600, Buffalo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "> JUST SO THAT AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ARE AWARE OF WHAT A
>>>>> LOW-LIFE
>>>>>> SCUM- BAG AARDVAR IS, THIS IS WHAT HE ASKED A SEANYMPH (OBVIOUSLY
>>>>>> NOT THE MOST EMOTIONALLY ROBUST PERSON IN THE WORLD):
>>>>>
>>>>> An exchange between you and Aardvark"
>>>>>
>>>>> Just who is 'you' in the above sentence? Wow! WTF are you
>>>>> replying to or what are you trying to get across? Buffalo
>>>>
>>>> WTF????? I have no idea, Buffalo. I'll check into it. I wrote
>>>> *none* of the above.
>>>
>>> I've checked it out. One of BD's amoral, scumbag, lowlife
>>> cheer-leading cunts (he only has two) appears to have copied and
>>> pasted the contents of a forged post ostensibly made in my name,
>>> then changed the first few lines of a recent post of mine,
>>> appending it at the top.
>>>
>>> Obviously because she sees nothing whatsoever wrong with on-line
>>> bullying of a widowed senior citizen of evident emotional fragility
>>> as indulged in by that low-life bullying sack of scum BD.
>>>
>>> Like a petulant child, he slimily attempted to denigrate the memory
>>> of her late husband simply because she vociferously rebuffed his
>>> advances. I was rightly outraged by his actions.
>>
>> An exchange between SN and Aardvark:
>>
>> See msg id's .. Aardvark did say these things.
>>
>>>>> "You're a fucking misanthropic bitch. But why should we dwell on
>>>>> your positive qualities?.....Who was the first in this exchange
>>>>> to become insulting you fucking hypocritical bitch?...The
>>>>> implication is that you are totally blind to and incapable of
>>>>> seeing your own hypocrisy. That doesn't surprise me in the least,
>>>>> you fucking nasty cunt.You either made your total lack of reading
>>>>> comprehension skills public or maliciously and deliberately
>>>>> misinterpreted what he said, you malicious, malevolent fucking
>>>>> harridan.Which was it, bitch? Nothing complicated. You're a
>>>>> fucking evil witch and your malignant venomousness oozes from
>>>>> just about every post you make." ----- Message-ID:
>>>>> hn3sp4$uq...@news.eternal-september.org Subject: Re: Is
>>>>> Opportunity Knocking? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:12:52 +0000 (UTC)
>>
>> Another exchange between SN and Aardvark
>>
>>>>> "Fuck, woman. The extreme fucking lengths you'll go to in order to
>>>>> avoid giving a straight answer to a simple question." ---
>>>>> Seanymph to YOU Message-ID:
>>>>> hn3qeu$3m...@news.eternal-september.org Subject: Re: Is
>>>>> Opportunity Knocking? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:33:15 -0500 "You
>>>>> are an idiot.  You're so full of hate that it seems to permeate
>>>>> much of what you say.  You're incapable of having any sort of
>>>>> civil conversation, except when you are discussing the rights or
>>>>> wrongs of the death penalty. You are very intolerant, unless
>>>>> someone kisses your ass, which doesn't happen too much.  You seem
>>>>> to believe everything you say is right, and anything that doesn't
>>>>> fit into your limited view is wrong. You are prone to wild and
>>>>> unsubstantiated speculation and you have an extremely limited
>>>>> vocabulary." Moving on.............
>
> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?

I can only guess he isn't a patient person?

-- 
Jenn

"Jenn" <me@noe.mail.com> wrote in message news:jlkblq$hph$1@dont-email.me...
In an amazing display of insensitivity, wannabe woman beater David Brooks
asks a random lady in MID <dICdnSmKnNQlaHPRnZ2dnUVZ7sOdnZ2d@bt.com>:

"Can you describe how it felt to have your breast(s) removed, SeaNympph?"

Low-life scum David Brooks continues his abuse
in MID <Zc2dnfB8oNwdoxbQnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com>:

"You mentioned that you are a cancer 'survivor'. After your treatment,
were you left with both breasts, one breast or simply none at all?" 

Jenn explained :
> Bear wrote:
>> "Jenn" <me@noe.mail.com> wrote in news:jl5bbd$5a4$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:39:33 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:17:23 -0600, Buffalo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "> JUST SO THAT AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ARE AWARE OF WHAT A
>>>>>> LOW-LIFE
>>>>>>> SCUM- BAG AARDVAR IS, THIS IS WHAT HE ASKED A SEANYMPH (OBVIOUSLY
>>>>>>> NOT THE MOST EMOTIONALLY ROBUST PERSON IN THE WORLD):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An exchange between you and Aardvark"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just who is 'you' in the above sentence? Wow! WTF are you
>>>>>> replying to or what are you trying to get across? Buffalo
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF????? I have no idea, Buffalo. I'll check into it. I wrote
>>>>> *none* of the above.
>>>>
>>>> I've checked it out. One of BD's amoral, scumbag, lowlife
>>>> cheer-leading cunts (he only has two) appears to have copied and
>>>> pasted the contents of a forged post ostensibly made in my name,
>>>> then changed the first few lines of a recent post of mine,
>>>> appending it at the top.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously because she sees nothing whatsoever wrong with on-line
>>>> bullying of a widowed senior citizen of evident emotional fragility
>>>> as indulged in by that low-life bullying sack of scum BD.
>>>>
>>>> Like a petulant child, he slimily attempted to denigrate the memory
>>>> of her late husband simply because she vociferously rebuffed his
>>>> advances. I was rightly outraged by his actions.
>>>
>>> An exchange between SN and Aardvark:
>>>
>>> See msg id's .. Aardvark did say these things.
>>>
>>>>>> "You're a fucking misanthropic bitch. But why should we dwell on
>>>>>> your positive qualities?.....Who was the first in this exchange
>>>>>> to become insulting you fucking hypocritical bitch?...The
>>>>>> implication is that you are totally blind to and incapable of
>>>>>> seeing your own hypocrisy. That doesn't surprise me in the least,
>>>>>> you fucking nasty cunt.You either made your total lack of reading
>>>>>> comprehension skills public or maliciously and deliberately
>>>>>> misinterpreted what he said, you malicious, malevolent fucking
>>>>>> harridan.Which was it, bitch? Nothing complicated. You're a
>>>>>> fucking evil witch and your malignant venomousness oozes from
>>>>>> just about every post you make." ----- Message-ID:
>>>>>> hn3sp4$uq...@news.eternal-september.org Subject: Re: Is
>>>>>> Opportunity Knocking? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:12:52 +0000 (UTC)
>>>
>>> Another exchange between SN and Aardvark
>>>
>>>>>> "Fuck, woman. The extreme fucking lengths you'll go to in order to
>>>>>> avoid giving a straight answer to a simple question." ---
>>>>>> Seanymph to YOU Message-ID:
>>>>>> hn3qeu$3m...@news.eternal-september.org Subject: Re: Is
>>>>>> Opportunity Knocking? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:33:15 -0500 "You
>>>>>> are an idiot.  You're so full of hate that it seems to permeate
>>>>>> much of what you say.  You're incapable of having any sort of
>>>>>> civil conversation, except when you are discussing the rights or
>>>>>> wrongs of the death penalty. You are very intolerant, unless
>>>>>> someone kisses your ass, which doesn't happen too much.  You seem
>>>>>> to believe everything you say is right, and anything that doesn't
>>>>>> fit into your limited view is wrong. You are prone to wild and
>>>>>> unsubstantiated speculation and you have an extremely limited
>>>>>> vocabulary." Moving on.............
>>
>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?
>
> I can only guess he isn't a patient person?

He's a bloody drunk and a doper.

-- 
Eagle
Socialism:
Tax dollars at work for those who don't

Bear wrote: 

>Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?

Just pay attention and watch the show.  Nobody likes the guy in
the theatre yelling out 'wadda he say?'.

-- 
An escalator can never break: it can only become stairs. You 
should never see an Escalator Temporarily Out Of Order sign, 
just Escalator Temporarily Stairs. Sorry for the convenience. -Mitch Hedberg

G. Morgan explained on 4/5/2012 :
> Bear wrote: 
>
>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?
>
> Just pay attention and watch the show.  Nobody likes the guy in
> the theatre yelling out 'wadda he say?'.

Or someone turning round and explaining the show in detail...

-- 
Eagle
I like you. People say I’ve got no taste, but I like you

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:

> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.

Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

Aardvark brought next idea :
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>
>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>
> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.

He is as long as I am in his bit bin. lol

-- 
Eagle
Socialism:
Tax dollars at work for those who don't

muslim convert, heading to mecca?

"Aardvark" <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in message 
news:jlkh8q$idd$4@dont-email.me...

 happy as a sand-boy, 

Aardvark wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
> 
>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
> 
> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
> 
Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...


-- 
http://www.privacySOS.org | www.extinctioncrisis.org
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
    _____  ____  ____ __ /\_/\ __      _ ______   _____
   / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \  \  __\
  _\ \/    / /_/ / _  / \     / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\  _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/   \_@_/   \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:27:11 -0600, §ñühwö£f wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>> 
>>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>> 
>> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
>> 
> Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...

LOL. All outa fish, mate. I can sling some shit their way, however.



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

on 4/5/2012, Aardvark supposed :
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:27:11 -0600, ���hw��f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>>> 
>>> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
>>> 
>> Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...
>
> LOL. All outa fish, mate. I can sling some shit their way, however.

Don't throw your food around meathead! Didn't your Mama teach you 
better?

-- 
Eagle
Socialism:
Tax dollars at work for those who don't

Eagle wrote:
> on 4/5/2012, Aardvark supposed :
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:27:11 -0600, ���hw��f wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>>>>
>>>> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
>>>>
>>> Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...
>>
>> LOL. All outa fish, mate. I can sling some shit their way, however.
>
> Don't throw your food around meathead! Didn't your Mama teach you better?
>

Eagle

That picture of Aardy with the gun - there were a few people in the 
picture other than hiself, weren't there?

I'd like to know if Aardvark received permission from *them* to post 
*their* images on the Internet. Maybe you'd ask, as he refuses to be 
civil to me? He seemed to think that important when I posted *my* 
picture the other day! ;-)

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:13:23 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> That picture of Aardy with the gun - there were a few people in the
> picture other than hiself, weren't there?
> 
> I'd like to know if Aardvark received permission from *them* to post
> *their* images on the Internet.

I have full rights over that image, cunt, and have had for nearly forty 
years, you may rest assured. I'm not going to tell you how I can be so 
sure, cunt- you'll just have to take my word for it.

> Maybe you'd ask, as he refuses to be
> civil to me?

I'm as civil to you as you deserve from me, cunt. More civil, in fact.

And how the fuck do you expect someone whose posts I don't see to ask me 
anything?

> He seemed to think that important when I posted *my*
> picture the other day! 

No, cunt, I *know* it's important.


-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:25:33 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

> Bear wrote:
> 
>>Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?
> 
> Just pay attention and watch the show.  Nobody likes the guy in the
> theatre yelling out 'wadda he say?'.

:-)



-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

On 4/5/2012 9:54 AM, Bear wrote:
> "Jenn"<me@noe.mail.com>  wrote in news:jl5bbd$5a4$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:39:33 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:17:23 -0600, Buffalo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ">  JUST SO THAT AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ARE AWARE OF WHAT A
>>>>> LOW-LIFE
>>>>>> SCUM- BAG AARDVAR IS, THIS IS WHAT HE ASKED A SEANYMPH (OBVIOUSLY
>>>>>> NOT THE MOST EMOTIONALLY ROBUST PERSON IN THE WORLD):
>>>>>

>
> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?
>

You don't need to be concerned about anything that went on between 
Aardvark and myself.  We had quite a few heated exchanges when I first 
started posting here.  However, Aardvark apologized for the things he 
said and we moved on.

The reposting of this stuff is just someone's way of attempting to start 
trouble. More accurately defined, it's called hate mongering.  There are 
those that would like you to believe things that simply aren't true. 
Since the parties involved have resolved their differences, there is no 
trouble to be had.

Moving on!!!!!!!!!!

SeaNymph brought next idea :

>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy. Why did he speak like that?
>>
>
> You don't need to be concerned about anything that went on between Aardvark 
> and myself.  We had quite a few heated exchanges when I first started posting 
> here.  However, Aardvark apologized for the things he said and we moved on.



Yeah, but you never did. You said some really nasty shit to him,  but 
never apologized for it.


>
> The reposting of this stuff is just someone's way of attempting to start 
> trouble. More accurately defined, it's called hate mongering. 



No, just making sure the REAL TRUTH is exposed, not your half-assed 
version.
As far as "hate mongering" is concerned, look at "alt.fan.jennicam" and 
YOU decide, Bear.



>There are 
> those that would like you to believe things that simply aren't true.


Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?

>Since the parties involved have resolved their differences, there is no 
> trouble to  be had.

Yeah, you got an apology from someone who NEVER apologizes! What a 
feather THAT is!

-- 
Eagle
I like you. People say I’ve got no taste, but I like you

Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:jlkvir$uch$6@dont-email.me:

> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:27:11 -0600, §ñühwö£f wrote:
> 
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>>> 
>>> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
>>> 
>> Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...
> 
> LOL. All outa fish, mate. I can sling some shit their way, however.
> 
Well at least you dont have the crazies over there like we has em here...

<http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/wolf_torture_and_execution_continues_in_the_northern_rockies/> 

Pretty damn disgusting...

-- 
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
    _____  ____  ____ __ /\_/\ __      _ ______   _____
   / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \  \  __\
  _\ \/    / /_/ / _  / \     / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\  _\
 /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/   \_@_/   \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

§ñühwö£f was thinking very hard :
> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:jlkvir$uch$6@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:27:11 -0600, §ñühwö£f wrote:
>> 
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:54:51 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Aardvark doesn't sound very happy.
>>>> 
>>>> Aardvark is happy as a sand-boy, thanks.
>>>> 
>>> Your fanbois are getting a bit edgy. Better throw them a fish...
>> 
>> LOL. All outa fish, mate. I can sling some shit their way, however.
>> 
> Well at least you dont have the crazies over there like we has em here...
>
> <http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/wolf_torture_and_execution_continues_in_the_northern_rockies/> 
>
> Pretty damn disgusting...

Yes it is. :/

-- 
Eagle
I like you. People say I’ve got no taste, but I like you

Bear explained :

>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear? 
>
> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?

Here you go Bear;

Seanymph to aardvark Message-ID: 
hn3qeu$3m...@news.eternal-september.org
Subject: Re: Is Opportunity Knocking? Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010
16:33:15 -0500
"You are an idiot.  You're so full of hate that it seems to permeate
much of what you say.  You're incapable of having any sort of civil
conversation, except when you are discussing the rights or wrongs of 
the
death penalty. You are very intolerant, unless someone kisses your ass,
which doesn't happen too much.  You seem to believe everything you say
is right, and anything that doesn't fit into your limited view is 
wrong.
You are prone to wild and unsubstantiated speculation and you have an
extremely limited vocabulary." Moving on.............

That was seanymph to aardvark.
What she said was typical seanymph. She responds like this so much, it 
should be her macro response.

-- 
Eagle
Friendship is like peeing your pants, everyone can see it, but only you 
can feel the true warmth.

Eagle wrote:
> Bear explained :
>
>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>
>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>
> Here you go Bear;

That was in response to this post of Aardvark:


You're a fucking misanthropic bitch. But why should we dwell on your
positive qualities?
 >  Liberals and/or socialists,
 > believe in certain things.

And kids believe in Father Christmas and fairies, and theists believe in a
God.
I just thought I'd join in your game of 'State the bleedin' obvious'. This
*is* fun, isn't it?
 > Many of those beliefs are identical.

Identical to what?
 > It's
 > easy to discern the mindset of people who often say such rude and
 > hateful things.

To which rude and hateful things are you referring?
 > For instance, you claimed you deliberately attack
 > persons, because you enjoy it.

Yes, those wilfully and proudly ignorant who are deserving of attack.
Y'know, people like you. Got a point?
 > It would appear you have a sense of
 > entitlement

There you go using that word again. As usual, sans definition.
 > that allows you to believe that insulting persons is a good
 > thing for you.

Who was the first in this exchange to become insulting you fucking
hypocritical bitch?
 >  See the implication here?  <probably not>

The implication is that you are totally blind to and incapable of seeing
your own hypocrisy. That doesn't surprise me in the least, you fucking
nasty cunt.
 > I didn't accuse that lying, scumbag you refer to as "BD" of anything.

Lying cunt.
 > I
 > made a statement concerning how his post read to me.

You either made  your total lack of reading comprehension skills public or
maliciously and deliberately misinterpreted what he said, you malicious,
malevolent fucking harridan.
Which was it, bitch? It can't have any other explanation other than one or
other of the ones I've offered.
 >  Do you understand
 > the concept expressed in the words "...sounds like"?

Yes, malicious and deliberate misrepresentation. You're a fucking expert
at that kind of thing you fucking horrible harpie.
 >  Why is this so
 > complicated for you?

Nothing complicated. You're a fucking evil witch and your malignant
venomousness oozes from just about every post you make.
 >    Perhaps when it comes to comprehending the
 > written word, you have a problem.

As I've said, I'm the one who neither misunderstood nor misinterpreted his
words. You're the one who did.

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.scorched-earth/msg/c53e4b7d016db0bf?hl=en&dmode=source
-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

~BD~ wrote :
> Eagle wrote:
>> Bear explained :
>>
>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>
>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>
>> Here you go Bear;
>
> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>
>
> You're a fucking misanthropic bitch. But why should we dwell on your
> positive qualities?
>  >  Liberals and/or socialists,
>  > believe in certain things.
>
> And kids believe in Father Christmas and fairies, and theists believe in a
> God.
> I just thought I'd join in your game of 'State the bleedin' obvious'. This
> *is* fun, isn't it?
>  > Many of those beliefs are identical.
>
> Identical to what?
>  > It's
>  > easy to discern the mindset of people who often say such rude and
>  > hateful things.
>
> To which rude and hateful things are you referring?
>  > For instance, you claimed you deliberately attack
>  > persons, because you enjoy it.
>
> Yes, those wilfully and proudly ignorant who are deserving of attack.
> Y'know, people like you. Got a point?
>  > It would appear you have a sense of
>  > entitlement
>
> There you go using that word again. As usual, sans definition.
>  > that allows you to believe that insulting persons is a good
>  > thing for you.
>
> Who was the first in this exchange to become insulting you fucking
> hypocritical bitch?
>  >  See the implication here?  <probably not>
>
> The implication is that you are totally blind to and incapable of seeing
> your own hypocrisy. That doesn't surprise me in the least, you fucking
> nasty cunt.
>  > I didn't accuse that lying, scumbag you refer to as "BD" of anything.
>
> Lying cunt.
>  > I
>  > made a statement concerning how his post read to me.
>
> You either made  your total lack of reading comprehension skills public or
> maliciously and deliberately misinterpreted what he said, you malicious,
> malevolent fucking harridan.
> Which was it, bitch? It can't have any other explanation other than one or
> other of the ones I've offered.
>  >  Do you understand
>  > the concept expressed in the words "...sounds like"?
>
> Yes, malicious and deliberate misrepresentation. You're a fucking expert
> at that kind of thing you fucking horrible harpie.
>  >  Why is this so
>  > complicated for you?
>
> Nothing complicated. You're a fucking evil witch and your malignant
> venomousness oozes from just about every post you make.
>  >    Perhaps when it comes to comprehending the
>  > written word, you have a problem.
>
> As I've said, I'm the one who neither misunderstood nor misinterpreted his
> words. You're the one who did.
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.scorched-earth/msg/c53e4b7d016db0bf?hl=en&dmode=source

<Looking myself over...looking for shrapnel wounds>
Can I come up from cover now Dave? 8-o

-- 
Eagle
Friendship is like peeing your pants, everyone can see it, but only you 
can feel the true warmth.

Eagle wrote:
[....]
> <Looking myself over...looking for shrapnel wounds>
> Can I come up from cover now Dave? 8-o

Hahaha! :-)

Rereading that I'm certain that it is Aardvark who has changed, not me!

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

~BD~ wrote :
> Eagle wrote:
> [....]
>> <Looking myself over...looking for shrapnel wounds>
>> Can I come up from cover now Dave? 8-o
>
> Hahaha! :-)
>
> Rereading that I'm certain that it is Aardvark who has changed, not me!

Remind Me to not draw down on you! lol

-- 
Eagle
Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you’ll ever 
regret.

On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Eagle wrote:
>> Bear explained :
>>
>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>
>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>
>> Here you go Bear;
> 
> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
> 
> 
> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>

Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?




-- 
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved 
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom 
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

Bear formulated on Friday :
> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:jln52r$35m$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>> 
>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>> Bear explained :
>>>> 
>>>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>>> 
>>>> Here you go Bear;
>>> 
>>> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>
>> 
>> Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?
>
> Apart from BD meeting you on a boat and talking about it here, what have you 
> got against him? What harm has he actually done to you in real life. 
>
> Can't you just be friends with him?

Go ahead and reply here, Dave...
----------------------------------------------------

I tried to do just that this week, Bear. I treated meathead with 
respect, and got that respect thrown in My face..violently.
You see how meathead calls Dave a "cunt" in every post Dave does?
Here is a quote from meathead, AKA "aardvark"....

"I'll
shift Heaven and Earth to find his post just so I can rub his slimy,
lying face in it."-- AARDVARK

From what I understand, this is STALKING.

-- 
Eagle
Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you’ll ever 
regret.

On 4/6/2012 12:36 PM, Bear wrote:
> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc>  wrote in news:jln52r$35m$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>> Bear explained :
>>>>
>>>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>>>
>>>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>>>
>>>> Here you go Bear;
>>>
>>> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>>>
>>>
>>> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>
>>
>> Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?
>
> Apart from BD meeting you on a boat and talking about it here, what have you
> got against him? What harm has he actually done to you in real life.
>
> Can't you just be friends with him?
>

I am always one to suggest that those who are unfamiliar with past 
events to not concern themselves with those things and simply form your 
own opinions based on what you experience in a given place.

SeaNymph laid this down on his screen :
> On 4/6/2012 12:36 PM, Bear wrote:
>> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc>  wrote in 
>> news:jln52r$35m$3@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>>> Bear explained :
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here you go Bear;
>>>>
>>>> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>
>>>
>>> Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?
>>
>> Apart from BD meeting you on a boat and talking about it here, what have 
>> you
>> got against him? What harm has he actually done to you in real life.
>>
>> Can't you just be friends with him?
>>
>
> I am always one to suggest that those who are unfamiliar with past events to 
> not concern themselves with those things and simply form your own opinions 
> based on what you experience in a given place.

Trying to sweep the incident under the carpet, SN?
Bear asked and He has a right to know the real truth.

-- 
Eagle
Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you’ll ever 
regret.

Eagle wrote:
> SeaNymph laid this down on his screen :
>> On 4/6/2012 12:36 PM, Bear wrote:
>>> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:jln52r$35m$3@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>>>> Bear explained :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here you go Bear;
>>>>>
>>>>> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>
>>>>
>>>> Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?
>>>
>>> Apart from BD meeting you on a boat and talking about it here, what
>>> have you
>>> got against him? What harm has he actually done to you in real life.
>>>
>>> Can't you just be friends with him?
>>>
>>
>> I am always one to suggest that those who are unfamiliar with past
>> events to not concern themselves with those things and simply form
>> your own opinions based on what you experience in a given place.
>
> Trying to sweep the incident under the carpet, SN?
> Bear asked and He has a right to know the real truth.
>

IAWTP

-- 
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

SeaNymph formulated the question :
> On 4/6/2012 3:48 PM, Eagle wrote:
>> SeaNymph laid this down on his screen :
>>> On 4/6/2012 12:36 PM, Bear wrote:
>>>> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>>> news:jln52r$35m$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:18:25 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>> Bear explained :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did you see what seanymph said to aardvark, Bear?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I missed it. When was it? Have you got a link?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here you go Bear;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was in response to this post of Aardvark:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <SNIP ANCIENT HISTORY>
>>>>>
>>>>> Got a point, you slimy, trouble-making cunt?
>>>>
>>>> Apart from BD meeting you on a boat and talking about it here, what
>>>> have you
>>>> got against him? What harm has he actually done to you in real life.
>>>>
>>>> Can't you just be friends with him?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am always one to suggest that those who are unfamiliar with past
>>> events to not concern themselves with those things and simply form
>>> your own opinions based on what you experience in a given place.
>>
>> Trying to sweep the incident under the carpet, SN?
>> Bear asked and He has a right to know the real truth.

>
> No sweeping going on.  I have no interest in rehashing things that were done, 
> handled and moved on from.  Besides, your dishonesty in what you did doesn't 
> speak well for you, since you fail to mention the truly relevant incidents, 
> you just mention those that make others look bad.
>
> Bear has no "right" to knowing anything as far as the history of the 
> newsgroup is concerned.  It's not his business.  You are doing nothing other 
> than attempting to prejudice this person by your choice of posts.   You do 
> not provide a full and complete history, only that history that suits your 
> agenda.  You don't provide the resolution, because then no one would really 
> look bad.  For you, it's just a smear campaign.  If people are interested, 
> let them look it up.  Then, if they really care, they can take the time to 
> winnow through hundreds of posts, get the WHOLE story, which btw takes a 
> period of time, and then make their own decisions.

Uh huh.... lol

-- 
Eagle
Friendship is like peeing your pants, everyone can see it, but only you 
can feel the true warmth.

Aardvark wrote :
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:06:35 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> You have *NEVER* caught me in a lie about anything. Ever.
>> 
>
> Caught you fucking hundreds of times deliberately not telling the truth, 
> cunt. Exactly the same.
>  
>> That's what you and Aardvark find so frustrating.
>
> Nothing 'frustrating' at all. You're just a slimy cunt, and we point out 
> your slime.
>
>> It is really hard to
>> argue with the truth - as you have found out to your cost.
>
> What the fuck are you blathering about, you sto0pid cunt?
>
>> 
>> You said "I know what you did that started this" - so, *please tell me*!
>
> How many fucking times do you have to be told, you sto0pid cunt?
>
>> I asked Aardvark and he refused to answer.
>
> For fuck's sake. I've told you, and I'm not the fucking only one who has.

-- 
Eagle
Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you’ll ever 
regret.

~BD~ has brought this to us :
> SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 4/6/2012 4:15 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2012 1:13 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>>>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:36:34 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can't you just be friends with him?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL. My friends have standards of morals and ethics far above what he
>>>>>>> could ever dream of having.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hang around for a while. You'll see exactly what I mean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>>>>>> yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk...gulp air...yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk
>>>>>> yuk
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah! You know he *has* no friends in RL, Eagle - that's why you are
>>>>> laughing so loudly! I'm almost certain that is what Aardvark's daughter
>>>>> told me, but he disputes this (as he disputes everything I say, but
>>>>> without telling folk what *he* thinks/knows she said).
>>>>
>>>> This BD, is a fine example of what you do so well. You push and goad
>>>> people to the point where they respond, then you whine and cry about
>>>> what horrid people they are. Seriously, grow up, get a life, and stop
>>>> being a troublemaking hate monger. You keep saying you want things to
>>>> change, but you really want is what your friend claims to want that
>>>> being "post in a manner I find acceptable". Doesn't work that way.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm good at what I do - always have been! Some people underestimate my
>>> skill and come to regret it. I think you have reached that stage.
>>
>> You are wrong. You don't concern me. I simply turn your information over
>> to the appropriate person and then I will let the chips fall where they
>> may. You revel in hurting others, and once again, you've said so. You
>> enjoy the hate and the lies you spew and you're proud of your actions.
>> Your so called friends, who ditched you (every one of them), never say
>> anything about the hateful things you do, which you apparently take as
>> acceptance, as so many others do.
>>
>>>
>>> You appear to condone Aardvark's behaviour but also claim that *you*
>>> want things to change. Maybe you should suggest to Aardvark that *he*
>>> grows up, gets a life and stops being a troublemaking hate monger.
>>
>> I want you to stop doing the hateful things you do. If you did, little
>> of this would continue. I never said I condoned his behavior, I have
>> always said I understand it. I know what you did that started this, and
>> I have watched you continue in the same vein for a long time. You do
>> what you do quite deliberately. You ask for it, over and over again with
>> your lies, your slime and your hateful innuendos. I have told him, and
>> others, right in this group, that they should simply ignore you. If you
>> have no one to goad, if no one responds, your continuing such behavior
>> will only reflect on you, as it should.
>>
>>>
>>> While you're at it, ask him what his daughter *actually" said!
>>
>> I most certainly will not. It's not my business. I will tell you this,
>> you lie so much that I would have an almost impossible time believing
>> anything you said. Protest all you want, I've seen it time and time again.
>
>
> *You* are wrong. You don't concern *me*.
>
> You have *NEVER* caught me in a lie about anything. Ever.
>
> That's what you and Aardvark find so frustrating. It is really hard to argue 
> with the truth - as you have found out to your cost.
>
> You said "I know what you did that started this" - so, *please tell me*! I 
> asked Aardvark and he refused to answer.

-- 
Eagle
Friendship is like peeing your pants, everyone can see it, but only you 
can feel the true warmth.

SeaNymph wrote on 4/6/2012 :
> On 4/6/2012 4:15 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>> On 4/6/2012 1:13 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Eagle wrote:
>>>>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:36:34 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can't you just be friends with him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL. My friends have standards of morals and ethics far above what he
>>>>>> could ever dream of having.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hang around for a while. You'll see exactly what I mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>>>>> yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk...gulp air...yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk
>>>>> yuk
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah! You know he *has* no friends in RL, Eagle - that's why you are
>>>> laughing so loudly! I'm almost certain that is what Aardvark's daughter
>>>> told me, but he disputes this (as he disputes everything I say, but
>>>> without telling folk what *he* thinks/knows she said).
>>>
>>> This BD, is a fine example of what you do so well. You push and goad
>>> people to the point where they respond, then you whine and cry about
>>> what horrid people they are. Seriously, grow up, get a life, and stop
>>> being a troublemaking hate monger. You keep saying you want things to
>>> change, but you really want is what your friend claims to want that
>>> being "post in a manner I find acceptable". Doesn't work that way.
>>
>>
>> I'm good at what I do - always have been! Some people underestimate my
>> skill and come to regret it. I think you have reached that stage.
>
> You are wrong.  You don't concern me.  I simply turn your information over to 
> the appropriate person and then I will let the chips fall where they may.  
> You revel in hurting others, and once again, you've said so.   You enjoy the 
> hate and the lies you spew and you're proud of your actions.  Your so called 
> friends, who ditched you (every one of them), never say anything about the 
> hateful things you do, which you apparently take as acceptance, as so many 
> others do.
>
>>
>> You appear to condone Aardvark's behaviour but also claim that *you*
>> want things to change. Maybe you should suggest to Aardvark that *he*
>> grows up, gets a life and stops being a troublemaking hate monger.
>
> I want you to stop doing the hateful things you do.  If you did, little of 
> this would continue. I never said I condoned his behavior, I have always said 
> I understand it.  I know what you did that started this, and I have watched 
> you continue in the same vein for a long time.  You do what you do quite 
> deliberately.  You ask for it, over and over again with your lies, your slime 
> and your hateful innuendos.  I have told him, and others, right in this 
> group, that they should simply ignore you.  If you have no one to goad, if no 
> one responds, your continuing such behavior will only reflect on you, as it 
> should.
>
>>
>> While you're at it, ask him what his daughter *actually" said!
>
> I most certainly will not.  It's not my business.  I will tell you this, you 
> lie so much that I would have an almost impossible time believing anything 
> you said.  Protest all you want, I've seen it time and time again.

-- 
Eagle
I like you. People say I’ve got no taste, but I like you