Microsoft Visual C++ vs. Borland C++ Builder

Article View: microsoft.public.vc.ide_general

Article #1

Back to microsoft.public.vc.ide_general Previous Next

From: Ian Murray
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:40

11 lines
1209 bytes

Hello all,

I'm soliciting opinions on Microsoft Visual C++  vs. Borland C++
Builder for GUI design and development.  I am partial to Visual C++,
and am attempting to defend it against a C++ Builder "legacy" within
my company.

Which do you prefer and why?

Thanks!
Ian

Technical Details

Message-ID: <d9e0a731.0204160540.3cfa8c4d@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f707b,1ab8265c8ca64270,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf707b,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fbec,1ab8265c8ca64270,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fbec,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-16 06:40:51 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: IMurray@applanix.com (Ian Murray)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.vc.ide_general,borland.public.cppbuilder.ide
Subject: Microsoft Visual C++  vs. Borland C++ Builder
Date: 16 Apr 2002 06:40:51 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <d9e0a731.0204160540.3cfa8c4d@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.191.151.98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018964451 20947 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2002 13:40:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2002 13:40:51 GMT