Article View: microsoft.public.vc
Article #1Re: Phar-Lap??
From: Henry Fleming
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 22:56
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 22:56
48 lines
3629 bytes
3629 bytes
I need to get the application working on Windows XP. Unfortunately it hangs sometimes when running on XP. It works fine on Windows 3.11, for which it was originally written. So I tried to recompile the code with a 32 bit compiler. That did not work due to reasons given. The application depends on C-scape for the user interface and on Phar-Lap Dos Extender for the computers and OS's of 1994. So I'm taking the somewhat lengthy but instructive step of rewriting the application in Win32. extenddos@yahoo.com (dosextender) wrote in message news:<d3270101.0405061315.1a6b64e7@posting.google.com>... > You will need to use the Win32 header files only. The 286 DOS-Extender > is a 16 bit environment, so header files will not interchange. > > The C-Scape library will probably only work in 16-bit protected mode > (or even real mode I'm not sure how it was built). Win32 has its own > native GUI and API. > > I'm not sure how your application works or how much of it depends on > the DOS-Extender / C-Scape. Why do you need to rebuild it? > > ph8794@yahoo.com (Henry Fleming) wrote in message news:<90cc3865.0405041303.3767657c@posting.google.com>... > > I did try to rebuild the application with a 32-bit compiler, but it > > wasn't successful. I tried to compile it without changing any code. > > The compiler complained about some typedefs already being defined, and > > didn't like the "typedef BYTE huge *ptr" declaration used in many > > files. Another thing about this application that I didn't mention is > > that it uses the C-SCAPE graphical library, and the compiler didn't > > like some of the code in there either. I have a feeling that it would > > take a very long time to fix the problems associated with this. > > > > Should I just rewrite the application in Win32? > > > > extenddos@yahoo.com (dosextender) wrote in message news:<d3270101.0405031444.52f605d7@posting.google.com>... > > > Yes you can rewrite the application to use the Win32 Native 32-bit > > > API. > > > > > > I would rebuild the application with a 32 bit compiler and replace all > > > OS2/Phar Lap API with their native equivalent. > > > > > > ph8794@yahoo.com (Henry Fleming) wrote in message news:<90cc3865.0405012031.328e4ab@posting.google.com>... > > > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to port a 16-bit DOS application to Windows XP. > > > > The program uses PharLap 286 extender. Can I discard this when I > > > > write the Windows XP version? > > > > > > > > Also, what is the best way to go about converting 16-bit DOS > > > > application to Windows XP version?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90cc3865.0405081456.6f0f60e6@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<90cc3865.0405012031.328e4ab@posting.google.com> <d3270101.0405031444.52f605d7@posting.google.com> <90cc3865.0405041303.3767657c@posting.google.com> <d3270101.0405061315.1a6b64e7@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4307,fe43f8ed1a721c73 X-Google-Thread: fa69e,102a3caa7d346477 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4307,gidfa69e,public Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: ph8794@yahoo.com (Henry Fleming) Newsgroups: microsoft.public.vc,borland.public.cpp.borlandcpp Subject: Re: Phar-Lap?? Date: 8 May 2004 15:56:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 48 Message-ID: <90cc3865.0405081456.6f0f60e6@posting.google.com> References: <90cc3865.0405012031.328e4ab@posting.google.com> <d3270101.0405031444.52f605d7@posting.google.com> <90cc3865.0405041303.3767657c@posting.google.com> <d3270101.0405061315.1a6b64e7@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.138.18.120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1084056974 1558 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2004 22:56:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 22:56:14 +0000 (UTC)