🚀 go-pugleaf

There's something else.  First, let me qualify this: I haven't tried JBuilder
2.0 yet.  But I have tried Visual J++ 6.0, and for writing Windows code and
using COM objects written in another language, it makes things really easy.
Imho, it may be the ultimate Windows programming language.

As far as WORA is concerned, Guy's hit the nail on the head.  JBuilder would
probably be a better choice.  It looks to me like the "Visual" part of Visual
J++ generates code dependent on Windows.  It depends on what you want--I
personally don't care about WORA.  I'm a Windows programmer.

I'm not a regular browser of this group, so please email replies to
jreyno@nwer.sandia.gov if you want me to see them.

John Reynolds

>
> jbinit() is just an internal method created by the JBuilder code
> generator.  There's nothing non-standard about having your own methods.
> If you create an applet with JBuilder, there will be an init() method
> created.  An applet wouldn't work without one.
>
> Guy
>
> Ryan Pedersen wrote:
> >
> > What about all the crap that JBuilder puts in the code.  I am new to
> > Java but the classes that I have taken all have me building public
> > void init() methods for an Applet and JBuilder does a method called
> > jbinit().  Is that a none Java compliant item or is that just the way
> > the code is built?  I too would like any advice for good visual
> > editors.
> >
> > Ryan Pedersen
> > ryanp@accessone.com
> > rpedersen@nextlink.net
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 15:18:47 +0200, Michael Hermann
> > <hermann@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> wrote:
> >
> > >dbalok@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am looking for some advice.  Which is better, Micro$oft's Visual J++ or
> > >> Borland's JBuilder?  and what makes it more better?
> > >
> > >JBuilder 2.0 without the slightest doubt.
> > >
> > >For one thing it has a far better IDE and visual modeler, for
> > >another it supports both JDK 1.1 and the 1.2 beta (while J++ 1.1
> > >does not even truly support 1.1).
> > >
> > >But most of all because JBuilder generates Java code whereas J++
> > >(any version) tries to lock you into MSes non-compatible version
> > >of Java.
> > >
> > >If you want to generate Java code, J++ is not the right tool, it's
> > >a non-Java compatible Java IDE !
> > >
> > > -Mike
>
> --
> Guy Scharf
> Software Architects, Inc.
> Mountain View, CA
> Developing software for ISVs
>


-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum