Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2

Article View: microsoft.public.visualj++

Article #12

Back to microsoft.public.visualj++ Previous Next

#12

From: Michael Hermann
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00

20 lines
1566 bytes

dbalok@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> 
> I am looking for some advice.  Which is better, Micro$oft's Visual J++ or
> Borland's JBuilder?  and what makes it more better?

JBuilder 2.0 without the slightest doubt.

For one thing it has a far better IDE and visual modeler, for
another it supports both JDK 1.1 and the 1.2 beta (while J++ 1.1
does not even truly support 1.1).

But most of all because JBuilder generates Java code whereas J++
(any version) tries to lock you into MSes non-compatible version
of Java.

If you want to generate Java code, J++ is not the right tool, it's
a non-Java compatible Java IDE !

 -Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fa3e3,90fd28b3e8cb7aba
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa3e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 103b67,90fd28b3e8cb7aba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103b67,public
X-Google-Thread: f5e83,90fd28b3e8cb7aba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cf9d,90fd28b3e8cb7aba
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf9d,public
From: Michael Hermann <hermann@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de>
Subject: Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2
Date: 1998/07/03
Message-ID: <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de>
X-Deja-AN: 368392231
Distribution: world
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.visualj++,borland.public.jbuilder.ide,borland.public.jbuilder.non-technical,comp.lang.java.softwaretools

Reply to Parent Message