Article View: microsoft.public.visualj++
Article #13Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2
From: dbalok
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00
6 lines
1145 bytes
1145 bytes
I am looking for some advice. Which is better, Micro$oft's Visual J++ or Borland's JBuilder? and what makes it more better? -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa3e3,90fd28b3e8cb7aba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfa3e3,public X-Google-Thread: f5e83,90fd28b3e8cb7aba,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public X-Google-Thread: 10cf9d,90fd28b3e8cb7aba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf9d,public X-Google-Thread: 103b67,90fd28b3e8cb7aba,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103b67,public From: dbalok@my-dejanews.com Subject: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2 Date: 1998/07/02 Message-ID: <6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Deja-AN: 368119499 X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; AK; Windows NT) Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jul 02 17:57:34 1998 GMT Newsgroups: microsoft.public.visualj++,borland.public.jbuilder.ide,borland.public.jbuilder.non-technical,comp.lang.java.softwaretools