Article View: microsoft.public.visualj++
Article #5Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2
From: Scott
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:00
38 lines
2529 bytes
2529 bytes
I just downloaded NetBeans ver 2.0 Beta 3 and have had some interesting results. First of all, running the program takes my System and GDI resources to 23 %. I have a pent. 233 with 64 M Ram. The program is very slow. Even worse, when I close the program, the System and GDI resources only rebound to 80$. VisualAge Java ver 1 runs easily on my system. I haven't read the release notes yet so maybe there is a fix, but my first impression is that this is a very resource hungry application with a big leak (no... not Java) in it somewhere. Scott Steven Lobo wrote: > > I just downloaded NetBeans Dev 2.0 . It is about 8.0Megs in size so I > could download it within an hour. Compare this to 50Megs of VAJ 2.0! > First impressions are that it is great. And the IDE is written using > Swing itself so you get to see a full fledged big Swing App in action. > > Try it and see it for yourself. > > Steven > > >Ryan Pedersen wrote in message <360f2594.28104059@news.accessone.com>... > >>What about all the crap that JBuilder puts in the code. > >[...] > >I too would like any advice for good visual editors. > > > >Check out NetBeans Developer 2.0. It adheres strictly to Swing/JFC > >standards. The user interface of the IDE itself is written using Swing's > >rich component set, and the Form Editor includes advanced support for visual > >development of Swing-based applets and applications. > > > >Roman Stanek > >www.netbeans.com > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3612DB68.D78FC07F@maine.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> <360f2594.28104059@news.accessone.com> <204285895F88D1118FAC00A0C933CDDF11FF84@PTOWN> <360fc9f4.1052135@news.storm.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cf9d,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf9d,public X-Google-Thread: fa3e3,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gidfa3e3,public X-Google-Thread: f5e83,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public X-Google-Thread: 103b67,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gid103b67,public From: Scott <slary61@maine.edu> Subject: Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2 Date: 1998/09/30 Message-ID: <3612DB68.D78FC07F@maine.edu> X-Deja-AN: 396534794 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> <360f2594.28104059@news.accessone.com> <204285895F88D1118FAC00A0C933CDDF11FF84@PTOWN> <360fc9f4.1052135@news.storm.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: University of Maine System Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: slary61@maine.edu Newsgroups: microsoft.public.visualj++,borland.public.jbuilder.ide,borland.public.jbuilder.non-technical,comp.lang.java.softwaretools