🚀 go-pugleaf

Ryan:

init() calls jbInit.  jbInit() allows for the segregation of the UI
construction (something that you are very likely to do anyway in an
Applet).

It's one method into which the UI designer places bean code, setters
and getters, etc.

It's no more or less Java compliant then any other method call in
init().

It's not like we pepper the code with a lot of comments saying "don't
change anything between these lines".  

-Rich

Ryan Pedersen wrote:
> 
> What about all the crap that JBuilder puts in the code.  I am new to
> Java but the classes that I have taken all have me building public
> void init() methods for an Applet and JBuilder does a method called
> jbinit().  Is that a none Java compliant item or is that just the way
> the code is built?  I too would like any advice for good visual
> editors.
> 
> Ryan Pedersen
> ryanp@accessone.com
> rpedersen@nextlink.net
> 
> On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 15:18:47 +0200, Michael Hermann
> <hermann@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> wrote:
> 
> >dbalok@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking for some advice.  Which is better, Micro$oft's Visual J++ or
> >> Borland's JBuilder?  and what makes it more better?
> >
> >JBuilder 2.0 without the slightest doubt.
> >
> >For one thing it has a far better IDE and visual modeler, for
> >another it supports both JDK 1.1 and the 1.2 beta (while J++ 1.1
> >does not even truly support 1.1).
> >
> >But most of all because JBuilder generates Java code whereas J++
> >(any version) tries to lock you into MSes non-compatible version
> >of Java.
> >
> >If you want to generate Java code, J++ is not the right tool, it's
> >a non-Java compatible Java IDE !
> >
> > -Mike

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rich Wilkman
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Borland JBuilder Team

If you see something that looks like an opinion up there,
it's mine and mine alone.

Mail sent to me from the newsgroups won't bounce but will
be ignored.  If I have time, I'll respond, but you  have
a better chance if you confine your posts to the newsgroups
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=