Article View: microsoft.public.visualj++
Article #9Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2
From: Guy Scharf
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:00
50 lines
2603 bytes
2603 bytes
Ryan, jbinit() is just an internal method created by the JBuilder code generator. There's nothing non-standard about having your own methods. If you create an applet with JBuilder, there will be an init() method created. An applet wouldn't work without one. Guy Ryan Pedersen wrote: > > What about all the crap that JBuilder puts in the code. I am new to > Java but the classes that I have taken all have me building public > void init() methods for an Applet and JBuilder does a method called > jbinit(). Is that a none Java compliant item or is that just the way > the code is built? I too would like any advice for good visual > editors. > > Ryan Pedersen > ryanp@accessone.com > rpedersen@nextlink.net > > On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 15:18:47 +0200, Michael Hermann > <hermann@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> wrote: > > >dbalok@my-dejanews.com wrote: > >> > >> I am looking for some advice. Which is better, Micro$oft's Visual J++ or > >> Borland's JBuilder? and what makes it more better? > > > >JBuilder 2.0 without the slightest doubt. > > > >For one thing it has a far better IDE and visual modeler, for > >another it supports both JDK 1.1 and the 1.2 beta (while J++ 1.1 > >does not even truly support 1.1). > > > >But most of all because JBuilder generates Java code whereas J++ > >(any version) tries to lock you into MSes non-compatible version > >of Java. > > > >If you want to generate Java code, J++ is not the right tool, it's > >a non-Java compatible Java IDE ! > > > > -Mike -- Guy Scharf Software Architects, Inc. Mountain View, CA Developing software for ISVs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<360FB992.30477EB5@swarc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> <360f2594.28104059@news.accessone.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103b67,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gid103b67,public X-Google-Thread: 10cf9d,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf9d,public X-Google-Thread: fa3e3,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gidfa3e3,public X-Google-Thread: f5e83,90fd28b3e8cb7aba X-Google-Attributes: gidf5e83,public From: Guy Scharf <guy@swarc.com> Subject: Re: Visual J++ v1.1 or JBuilder v2 Date: 1998/09/28 Message-ID: <360FB992.30477EB5@swarc.com> X-Deja-AN: 395673078 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6nghme$cho$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <359CDA37.2781E494@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de> <360f2594.28104059@news.accessone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 907000207 13532 (none) 206.86.0.12 Organization: Software Architects, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: microsoft.public.visualj++,borland.public.jbuilder.ide,borland.public.jbuilder.non-technical,comp.lang.java.softwaretools