🚀 go-pugleaf

Noteworthy as it affects all Americans.

Ratchet


"B Jones" <b_jones@no.mail> wrote in message
news:NXK2SKQJ37013.8717939815@frog.nyarlatheotep.org...
>
> JEWISH INVOLVEMENT IN SHAPING U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICY.
>
> Jewish radicals or leftists promoted open immigration in order to
> break-up any Anglo-Saxon hegemony in the United States. But this
> same pattern was used in other Western countries as well, to make
> them safe for Judaism. In their way of thinking, only countries
> where there is no cultural or racial majority could Jews feel safe
> from anti-Semitism. It mattered little to them whether any country
> (aside from Israel) had the right to determine their own destiny. It
> was incumbent upon these Jews to alter the very make-up of those
> countries they lived among, even while they themselves held dual
> loyalties with the United States and Israel. This activism was just
> one more hammer blow directed at preventing any mass movement that
> may interfere with their own evolutionary goals for dominance over
> culture, academics, and material wealth accumulation.
>
> And the safest immigrants to use for this purpose are any that are
> not European, and also would not challenge Jewish interests in the
> future. Flooding the country with Hispanics was especially
> beneficial, as they would not challenge Judaism in any intellectual
> field due to their low intelligence, and yet they were also a
> diverse group that had maintained allegiances and continued
> conflicts amongst themselves. Puerto Ricans dislike Mexicans and
> vice versa, and both groups are hostile to blacks. So these new
> immigrants would disrupt the American status quo without threatening
> it with another singularly powerful group that could also easily
> become anti- Semitic.
>
> The African American's already here were also brought into this
> multiculturalism by way of monetary and intellectual support by
> Jewish groups. Until 1933, there were no black lawyers in the Jewish
> supported NAACP. The main purpose of Jewish support for black civil
> rights was to aid in their own Jewish efforts against gentiles, not
> concern for the well-being of blacks. Blacks, like immigrants, were
> just pawns in the ongoing group tribalism between gentiles and Jews,
> while the gentiles never understood that the civil rights movement
> was primarily a Jewish led movement, with gentiles recruited to
> legitimize it.
>
> It was always promoted as purely a moral issue. "Jews want cultural
> pluralism because of their long-term policy of [racial] non-
> assimilation and group solidarity" while fighting what they maintain
> is their greatest danger, "Anglo-Saxon (read Caucasian) nationalism
> as their greatest potential threat and they have tended to support
> black integration policies, presumably because such policies dilute
> Caucasian power and lessen the possibility of a cohesive,
> nationalist anti-Semitic Caucasian majority. At the same time,
> Jewish organizations have opposed a black nationalist position while
> pursuing an anti-assimilationist, nationalist group strategy for
> their own group."
>
> The 1924 immigration act was a highly debated and emotional, one
> reported by Stephen Jay Gould as a racist attempt to restrict other
> groups because they were seen as being of lesser intelligence. But
> the Congressional Record and other observers and researchers of the
> debates report quite a different story.
>
> " The Jews from the East during these debates were not welcome, not
> because of some supposed mental defect, but because they were viewed
> as being radicalized, unpatriotic, infected with Bolshevism, and
> unassimilable. Contrary to what has been portrayed, it was the
> racist nature of this group, their unwillingness to marry out, there
> view of Judaism not as a religion but as a racially superior group
> opposed to allowing gentiles to convert to Judaism, and there
> secular separateness that made them unwelcome. These were cultural,
> not racial reasons for not wanting them to immigrate to the United
> States, because it was understood that as a blood cult, they would
> in fact resist the very assimilation they accused others of trying
> to shun. As it turns out, they did in fact behave exactly as those
> resisting the 1924 immigration act predicted, and have continued
> dual patriotism and have not assimilated into American culture.
>
> But the relentless Jewish lobby finally won out. From 1953 with the
> passage of the McCarran-Walter Act to restrict immigration, until
> the 1965 immigration act that opened the flood gates to immigration,
> America would be no more. And even now they are rejoicing that by
> 2050, whites will be in the minority and no longer able to interfere
> with Jewish interests. "The implicit assumption [of Jewish groups]
> is that the United States ought to be composed of cohesive subgroups
> with a clear sense of their group interests in opposition to the
> peoples deriving from Northern and Western Europe or of the United
> States as a whole.
>
> The Jewish radicals clearly saw a distinct group of Europeans as the
> enemy, one to be destroyed and annihilated by immigration. How could
> they have not seen that as secularism grows, white people can
> coalesce around a common threat. As others, much different from us
> enter the United States, old rivalries based on religion or ethnic
> differences will melt away. The new Nordic or Aryan threat is no
> more because those people did in fact give up their racialist ways
> and assimilated. But primarily with other groups that equally could
> be a problem for Jewish hegemony over the West. It was a bad gamble,
> and even now as immigration continues it is mobilizing the very
> forces that it was supposed to obliterate. Whites everywhere are
> beginning to wake up and take action, and it will not be forgotten
> from where this tragedy began and for what purpose. To destroy the
> dominant white culture in a world where diversity was to be
> cherished, not destroyed. The hypocrisy and lies are now exposed.
>
> http://home.att.net/~eugenics/mac.htm
>
>