🚀 go-pugleaf

I simply do not understand how one can develop an opinion without
researching all the facts regarding the topic. I just posted to
another thread regarding DU. The big debate should be how inhumane it
is - not because of radiation but how it does its damage.

While DU ammo does leave traces of radiation, it is not harmful except
for in large quantities. So, there are several battlefields that have
higher radiation levels. Battlefields do not constitute townships :P

Also, this has absolutely nothing to do with the Bush family. Bush may
be commander-in-chief, but he's not the one deciding exactly what
weapons to send over.

Clinton, leave it up to the honorable United States Generals
protecting you and myself from harm. Left is not always right.

-Steve, ranting from Mequon

"clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in message news:<rXnS9.7853$CC3.152020@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>...
> Like the filth in Milwaukee the Bush family is filthy and evil. George Sr.
> had munitions made from Depleted Uranium (DU) and ordered them
> to be used in the Gulf War that many now know was the United
> States using its military might to prevent Hussein from attacking Kuwait
> who was assisting the Bush Crime Family Oil Cartel to slant drill under
> the Iraqi borders to steal Iraq's oil.
> 
> Military whistle blowers have exposed the facts explaining that the military
> expended some 30 MILLION TONS of radioactive waste scattered all
> over Iraq that Bush Sr. ordered to be used intending to destroy all forms
> of life INCLUDING NON-COMBATANTS.
> 
> Not to mention the exposed morons from the U.S. military that
> obeyed evil orders and conducted evil in the name of the
> American people.
> 
> I recall a report stating there are over 700,000 U.S. soldiers that
> 'served' in the Gulf War were exposed and are now bleeding out
> of their @sses and have other ailments the Veterans Administration
> conveniently denies is service related just like these filthy evil bastards
> did post-Viet Nam after being discovered that the United States
> used chemical weapons to destroy the enemy.
> 
> These soldiers are presumably continuing to have sexual intercourse
> with wives, husbands and other sexual partners.
> (this context to become immediately relevant)
> 
> George Jr. intends to invade Iraq and use DU again.
> 
> So when the morons ask "Why do they hate us?" Simply look
> at the photographs of the hideously deformed bodies of their children.
> 
> If you have the courage to look upon the evil that our nation has
> caused look here:
> http://www.answering-christianity.com/iraqi_torture.htm
> 
> I wonder if the moronic American people will wake up when
> these filthy pigs can no longer keep the secret that children of
> exposed U.S. soldiers are also being hideously deformed?
> 
> I am ashamed to be an American.
> 
> --
> <%= Clinton Gallagher
>          A/E/C Consulting, Web Design, e-Commerce Software Development
>          Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin USA
>          NET csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com
>          URL http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <gryb> wrote in message news:gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com...
> > the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass
>  destruction are found
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> _
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bush will launch an invasion even if nothing is found by the UN weapons
>  inspectors.
> >
> > A "clean bill of health" from the UN will not halt the war machine.
> >
> > The Bush Administration is duping the world into believing it supports
>  these inspections.
> >
> > And the media is attempting to uphold the fiction that the resumption of
>  weapons inspections
> > is an honest and serious attempt to avoid war.
> >
> > The Bush Administration attitude is,  that if no weapons of mass
>  destruction are found in Iraq,
> > that does not prove that weapons of mass destruction do not exist in Iraq.
> > Their view is,  that it is not necessary to produce evidence to justify an
>  invasion.
> >
> > If the inspectors' findings do not provide the necessary pretext,  Bush
>  will ignore the
> > inspectors in favour of some other excuse.
> >
> > Sending the UN to Iraq was a manoeuvre to provide a pretext for the
>  invasion.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > http://www.supplysideinvestor.com/showarticle.asp?articleid=2128
> >
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,838728,00.html
> >
> > http://www.iht.com/articles/79496.htm
> >
> > http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1121-08.htm
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> _
> >