Re: the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass destruction are found

Article View: milw.general

Article #268

#268

From: Buckwheat
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:04

38 lines
3285 bytes

"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in message
news:zHqdnfqPqsT1QIOjXTWc3Q@speakeasy.net...
> In article <avmd7v$p2d$1@news1.ij.net>,
> die gedanken sind frei <judgedredd@ij.net> wrote:
> >
> >"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> >news:qvacnUNjvMX5FICjXTWcqg@speakeasy.net...
> >> In article <avjufl$261q$1@news1.ij.net>,
> >> die gedanken sind frei <judgedredd@ij.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> >> >>
> >> >> Carry a chunk of the stuff in your undershorts for a while and tell
me
> >> >> about it.  Or just strap it to your arm.  Yes, it's not VERY
> >> >> dangerous.  But it is radioactive and it's not healthy to spend long
> >> >> periods in close proximity to it.  Taking it internally is also
> >> >> contraindicated for reasons of radiation and chemical poisoning.
> >> >
> >> >Oh gee, try swallowing a pound of lead and see how much it helps the
> >system.
> >> >Not because of radio activity but chemical toxicity.
> >
> >> So, you're willing to carry a chunk in your undershorts or strapped to
> >> your arm?
> >
> >    Are you willing to swallow the mercury out of a thermometer?
>
> No, because it's poisonous.  Doesn't explain why you wouldn't carry a
> chunk of depleted uranium strapped to your arm or to your undershorts.
>
> >I see you cannot answer the quote I provided
>
> It doesn't support your case.  DU is radioactive, and significantly
> (though not greatly) so.

Bullshit!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <avpt5i$2h20$1@news1.ij.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.75.MISMATCH!feed1.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.ij.net!not-for-mail

References:

<gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com> <avjufl$261q$1@news1.ij.net> <qvacnUNjvMX5FICjXTWcqg@speakeasy.net> <avmd7v$p2d$1@news1.ij.net> <zHqdnfqPqsT1QIOjXTWc3Q@speakeasy.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a9ce,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a9ce,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-Thread: fcd36,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,34085a3df1a6e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-11 12:14:07 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.75.MISMATCH!feed1.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.ij.net!not-for-mail
From: "Buckwheat" <judgedredd@ij.net>
Newsgroups: milw.general,co.general,balt.general,dc.general,la.general,ba.general
Subject: Re: the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass destruction are found
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:04:16 -0500
Organization: Internet Junction
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <avpt5i$2h20$1@news1.ij.net>
References: <gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com> <avjufl$261q$1@news1.ij.net> <qvacnUNjvMX5FICjXTWcqg@speakeasy.net> <avmd7v$p2d$1@news1.ij.net> <zHqdnfqPqsT1QIOjXTWc3Q@speakeasy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p44-127.tnt2.ij.net
X-Trace: news1.ij.net 1042315251 83008 209.4.44.127 (11 Jan 2003 20:00:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: sysadmin@ij.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:00:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Reply to Parent Message