Article View: milw.general
Article #277Re: the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass destruction are found
From: die gedanken sind frei
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:49
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:49
103 lines
7509 bytes
7509 bytes
"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:mNacnQvpd4qhboGjXTWcqQ@speakeasy.net... > In article <avie6m$ru1$1@news1.ij.net>, > die gedanken sind frei <judgedredd@ij.net> wrote: > > > >"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@grace.speakeasy.net> wrote in message > >news:PhWdncpN2tsF1IGjXTWcog@speakeasy.net... > > > >> Depleted uranium is radioactive; it is an alpha emitter. > > > > > >God I knew this bullshit would come up.... I knew the brain dead just had to > >make the claim..... Lots of things emit some radiation. The question should > >be (but sadly is not in the political twit circles) is it more active than > >background radiation? > > Yes. Depleted uranium emits well over your AAC recommended daily > allowance of alpha particles. > > >I can hold out hope that the important parts of the information below will > >be understood by those with more than .25% brain capacity. Yes, depleted > >Uranium emits some alpha particles ( those are blocked by the skin) and not > >hazardous. > > Carry a chunk of the stuff in your undershorts for a while and tell me > about it. Or just strap it to your arm. Yes, it's not VERY > dangerous. But it is radioactive and it's not healthy to spend long > periods in close proximity to it. Taking it internally is also > contraindicated for reasons of radiation and chemical poisoning. Oh gee, try swallowing a pound of lead and see how much it helps the system. Not because of radio activity but chemical toxicity. I will repeat my source again. See if you can figure out what the "real" scientists say aboujt the radiation of DU instead of hysterical political activists. ------------------------------- Q. What makes depleted uranium a potential hazard? A. Depleted uranium is a heavy metal that is also slightly radioactive. Heavy metals (uranium, lead, tungsten, etc.) have chemical toxicity properties that, in high doses, can cause adverse health effects. Depleted uranium that remains outside the body can not harm you. A common misconception is that radiation is depleted uranium's primary hazard. This is not the case under most battlefield exposure scenarios. Depleted uranium is approximately 40 percent less radioactive than natural uranium. Depleted uranium emits alpha and beta particles, and gamma rays. Alpha particles, the primary radiation type produced by depleted uranium, are blocked by skin, while beta particles are blocked by the boots and battle dress utility uniform (BDUs) typically worn by service members. While gamma rays are a form of highly-penetrating energy , the amount of gamma radiation emitted by depleted uranium is very low. Thus, depleted uranium does not significantly add to the background radiation that we encounter every day. When fired, or after "cooking off" in fires or explosions, the exposed depleted uranium rod poses an extremely low radiological threat as long as it remains outside the body. Taken into the body via metal fragments or dust-like particles, depleted uranium may pose a long-term health hazard to personnel if the amount is large. However, the amount which remains in the body depends on a number of factors, including the amount inhaled or ingested, the particle size and the ability of the particles to dissolve in body fluids. Q. Were any studies on the health effects of depleted uranium ever conducted prior to the onset of the Gulf War? What were the findings of those studies? A. The health effects of uranium have been studied extensively for over 50 years. In September 1999 the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry published a Toxicological Profile for Uranium, an update to the original profile published in May 1989. While natural and depleted uranium are considered chemically toxic, they are not considered a radiation hazard. The environmental effects of depleted uranium have been studied comprehensively by a wide range of governmental and non-governmental bodies both before and after the Gulf War. Burn tests and other evaluations performed under simulated battlefield conditions indicated that the health risks associated with the battlefield use of depleted uranium were minimal and even those could be reduced even more by simple, field-expedient measures, especially, avoidance of depleted uranium-contaminated vehicles and sites. During and after the Gulf War, personnel awareness of the hazards posed by battlefield depleted uranium contamination was generally low. As a result, many personnel did not practice field-expedient measures that would have prevented or mitigated possible exposures. Q. What are the health effects of contact with unfired depleted uranium munitions or unperforated (intact) armor on the various weapons systems, such as the Abrams Heavy Tank? A. Unfired depleted uranium munitions are encased in thin metal jackets that seal in alpha and beta particles, and allow only extremely slight gamma emissions which fall well below regulatory health and safety limits. Similarly, depleted uranium panels used in tank armor pose no health risk because the depleted uranium is sealed inside several inches of regular steel armor. Alpha radiation, which is the major concern for internalized depleted uranium, is not an external concern because alpha radiation does not penetrate the outer layers of skin. The second source of radiation is from the depleted uranium rounds stored on board the tank. While soldiers are exposed to an increased level of radiation from the stored munitions, the cumulative exposure levels for tank crewmembers are within applicable guidelines. Since depleted uranium munitions are only used in combat, only forward-deployed vehicles are routinely uploaded with depleted uranium munitions.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<avjufl$261q$1@news1.ij.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.ij.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com> <avh8qs$2psm$1@news1.ij.net> <PhWdncpN2tsF1IGjXTWcog@speakeasy.net> <avie6m$ru1$1@news1.ij.net> <mNacnQvpd4qhboGjXTWcqQ@speakeasy.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public X-Google-Thread: fcd36,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd36,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 10a9ce,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a9ce,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,34085a3df1a6e4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-09 05:54:01 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.ij.net!not-for-mail From: "die gedanken sind frei" <judgedredd@ij.net> Newsgroups: milw.general,co.general,balt.general,dc.general,la.general,ba.general Subject: Re: the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass destruction are found Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 08:49:15 -0500 Organization: Internet Junction Lines: 108 Message-ID: <avjufl$261q$1@news1.ij.net> References: <gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com> <avh8qs$2psm$1@news1.ij.net> <PhWdncpN2tsF1IGjXTWcog@speakeasy.net> <avie6m$ru1$1@news1.ij.net> <mNacnQvpd4qhboGjXTWcqQ@speakeasy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: p17-67.tnt3.ij.net X-Trace: news1.ij.net 1042119991 71738 209.4.17.67 (9 Jan 2003 13:46:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: sysadmin@ij.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:46:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000