🚀 go-pugleaf

"toad-o-line" <someone@somewhere.net> wrote in message
news:avecrf$jtb$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net...
>
> " Joshua" <Joshua@Jericho.com> wrote in message
> news:GluS9.933$aD3.841@tornadotest1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> > <gryb> wrote in message
news:gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com...
> > > the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of mass
> > destruction are found
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bush will launch an invasion even if nothing is found by the UN
weapons
> > inspectors.
> > >
> >
> > Good!
>
> Yeah, let's waste the lives of  young American boys who are fighting for
> nothing.  Oops!  I forgot;  they're fighting to divert American attention
> from the fact that Bush, just like his father, has no plan for our economy
> that's deep in the tax-cut crapper.  Divert attention from the fact that
> protection of individual liberties are gone.
> >

I suppose you'd prefer that we sit on our collective hands and employ the
Chamberlain maneuver until Iraq brings their next generation of terrorism to
our shores?   No thank you!


>
> > > <snip pointless polemic>
> >
> >
> > > And the media is attempting to uphold the fiction that the resumption
of
> > weapons inspections
> > > is an honest and serious attempt to avoid war.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I don't think you can use "media" and "honest" in the same sentence with
a
> > straight face.
> >
> > That includes Fox "News" big boy.  No spin my foot.
>

Fox is certainly more balanced than CNN, but then I don't really expect you
to ever admit nor even recognize that fact.


> > > The Bush Administration attitude is,  that if no weapons of mass
> > destruction are found in Iraq,
> > > that does not prove that weapons of mass destruction do not exist in
> Iraq.
> > > Their view is,  that it is not necessary to produce evidence to
justify
> an
> > invasion.
> > >
> >
> > Just because YOU haven't seen the evidence, does not mean it does not
> exist,
> > cupcake!
>
> And YOU have?  Or you're just taking Bush's word for it?  "Trust me, my
> daughters Barb and Jenna don't drink...!">
> >


As a matter of fact I have, junior!   Going into the detail here would
entail violating the terms of my security clearances on the matter though
and it's SO much more fun to watch you and other idiots like you twist in
the wind spouting on about things you know not.



> > > If the inspectors' findings do not provide the necessary pretext,
Bush
> > will ignore the
> > > inspectors in favour of some other excuse.
> > >
> >
> > *YAWN* !
> >
> Yeah, because it's a lot easier to attack Iraq than it is to attack the
REAL
> threat:  North Korea.  Bush is not only a liar but a pussy as well.
>


you mean the "real threat" that, like so many other threats in the world
today, that is the product of the Clinton administration?