🚀 go-pugleaf

" Joshua" <Joshua@Jericho.com> wrote in message
news:qhDS9.954$aD3.35@tornadotest1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "toad-o-line" <someone@somewhere.net> wrote in message
> news:avecrf$jtb$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net...
> >
> > " Joshua" <Joshua@Jericho.com> wrote in message
> > news:GluS9.933$aD3.841@tornadotest1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > >
> > > <gryb> wrote in message
> news:gpvj1v4q0otqg819sjbc1sq3d2vr3t7fge@4ax.com...
> > > > the planned invasion of Iraq will go ahead even if no weapons of
mass
> > > destruction are found
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bush will launch an invasion even if nothing is found by the UN
> weapons
> > > inspectors.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Good!
> >
> > Yeah, let's waste the lives of  young American boys who are fighting for
> > nothing.  Oops!  I forgot;  they're fighting to divert American
attention
> > from the fact that Bush, just like his father, has no plan for our
economy
> > that's deep in the tax-cut crapper.  Divert attention from the fact that
> > protection of individual liberties are gone.
> > >
>
> I suppose you'd prefer that we sit on our collective hands and employ the
> Chamberlain maneuver until Iraq brings their next generation of terrorism
to
> our shores?   No thank you!
>
No, I'd prefer we confront the threat that is, not the easy one that might
be.  North Korea has nukes,  Iraq may have something.  Bush is just too much
of a pussy to confront the real threat.>
> >
> > > > <snip pointless polemic>
> > >
> > >
> > > > And the media is attempting to uphold the fiction that the
resumption
> of
> > > weapons inspections
> > > > is an honest and serious attempt to avoid war.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think you can use "media" and "honest" in the same sentence
with
> a
> > > straight face.
> > >
> > > That includes Fox "News" big boy.  No spin my foot.
> >
>
> Fox is certainly more balanced than CNN, but then I don't really expect
you
> to ever admit nor even recognize that fact.
>
> I don't watch CNN.  Fox is a laugh: one step above The National Enquirer.
And their idea of 'balance" is giving airtime to that fruitcake Alan Colmes.
But then I don't really expect a bootlicking conservative toady like
yourself to ever admit or recognize that fact.  People like you are content
to treat the bleatings of former AM deejays like Rush Limbaugh as fact.  Go
on deluding yourself that Fox is balanced.... it's good for a laugh.

> > > > The Bush Administration attitude is,  that if no weapons of mass
> > > destruction are found in Iraq,
> > > > that does not prove that weapons of mass destruction do not exist in
> > Iraq.
> > > > Their view is,  that it is not necessary to produce evidence to
> justify
> > an
> > > invasion.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just because YOU haven't seen the evidence, does not mean it does not
> > exist,
> > > cupcake!
> >
> > And YOU have?  Or you're just taking Bush's word for it?  "Trust me, my
> > daughters Barb and Jenna don't drink...!">
> > >
>
>
> As a matter of fact I have, junior!   Going into the detail here would
> entail violating the terms of my security clearances on the matter though
> and it's SO much more fun to watch you and other idiots like you twist in
> the wind spouting on about things you know not.
>
Bullshit. No more needs be said.  You have no security clearance, except
maybe one you got from the back pages of Marvel Comics.
>
> > > > If the inspectors' findings do not provide the necessary pretext,
> Bush
> > > will ignore the
> > > > inspectors in favour of some other excuse.
> > > >
> > >
> > > *YAWN* !
> > >
> > Yeah, because it's a lot easier to attack Iraq than it is to attack the
> REAL
> > threat:  North Korea.  Bush is not only a liar but a pussy as well.
> >
>
>
> you mean the "real threat" that, like so many other threats in the world
> today, that is the product of the Clinton administration?
>
> Try again.  The nuke threat from North Korea well predates Bill Clinton.
Guess your 'security clearance' doesn't provide you with actual facts.